...
首页> 外文期刊>Blood pressure. >An eight-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of fixed-doseamlodipine/benazepril combination in comparison with amlodipine as first-line therapy in Chinese patients with mild to moderate hypertension
【24h】

An eight-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of fixed-doseamlodipine/benazepril combination in comparison with amlodipine as first-line therapy in Chinese patients with mild to moderate hypertension

机译:一项为期八周的多中心,随机,双盲研究,旨在评价固定的西多莫地平/贝那普利联合氨氯地平作为中国轻度至中度高血压患者的一线治疗的疗效和耐受性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aims. This study sought to compare the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of a fixed-dose combination with amlodipine/benazepril with that of amlodipine monotherapy in Chinese hypertensive subjects. Results. This multicenter, double-blind, 8-week study randomized 111 patients to fixed-dose amlodipine besylate/benazepril HC1 (2.5/5 mg/day titrated to 5/10 mg/day as needed at week 4 to reach goal blood pressure (BP) < 140/90 mmHg) or amlodipine besylate monotherapy (5 mg/day titrated to 10 mg/day as needed). At week 8, patients randomized to combination therapy compared with monotherapy had a comparable BP control rate (56.0% vs 46.2%; p=0.32). Fixed-dose combination resulted in similar reductions in sitting systolic (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) compared with monotherapy (SBP: -19.3 + 12.5 vs -20.9+-13.3 mmHg; DBP: -9.2+-10.4vs -11.3 + 9.3 mmHg; both p=NS). Safety profiles did not differ between groups, but cough was more common in the combination group (11.0% vs 0%; p=0.013). Conclusions. In this group of patients, comparable antihypertensive effects were seen with the fixed-dose combination therapy, compared with amlodipine monotherapy. Both treatments appeared well tolerated in the studied population, but cough was more common in the fixed-dose combination group.
机译:目的这项研究试图比较固定剂量联合氨氯地平/贝那普利与氨氯地平单药治疗在中国高血压患者中的抗高血压功效和耐受性。结果。这项多中心,双盲,为期8周的研究将111例患者随机分配至固定剂量的苯磺酸氨氯地平/贝那普利HC1(2.5 / 5 mg /天,根据第4周的需要滴定至5/10 mg /天,以达到目标血压(BP )(<140/90 mmHg)或苯磺酸氨氯地平单药治疗(根据需要将5 mg /天滴定至10 mg /天)。在第8周时,随机接受联合治疗的患者与单药治疗相比具有可比的BP控制率(56.0%对46.2%; p = 0.32)。与单一疗法相比,固定剂量的组合导致坐姿收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)的降低相似(SBP:-19.3 + 12.5 vs -20.9 + -13.3 mmHg; DBP:-9.2 + -10.4vs -11.3 + 9.3 mmHg;均p = NS)。各组之间的安全性没有差异,但在联合治疗组中咳嗽更为常见(11.0%vs 0%; p = 0.013)。结论在这组患者中,与氨氯地平单药治疗相比,固定剂量联合治疗可观察到类似的降压作用。两种治疗方法在研究人群中似乎耐受良好,但在固定剂量联合治疗组中咳嗽更为常见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号