首页> 外文期刊>Journal of instrumentation: an IOP and SISSA journal >A comparative evaluation of luminescence detectors: RPL-GD-301, TLD-100 and OSL-AL_2O_3:C, using Monte Carlo simulations
【24h】

A comparative evaluation of luminescence detectors: RPL-GD-301, TLD-100 and OSL-AL_2O_3:C, using Monte Carlo simulations

机译:发光检测器的比较评估:RPL-GD-301,TLD-100和OSL-AL_2O_3:C,使用Monte Carlo Simulation

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The luminescent dosimeters are widely used in clinical practice, for the monitoring of patient dose in external radiation therapy. Three of the most common dosimeter categories are the thermoluminescence (TLDs), the radiophotoluminescence (RPLs) and the optically stimulated luminescence (OSLs), with similar physical processes on their properties. The aim of the present study is to compare and evaluate the dosimetric properties of three specific luminescent detectors namely: a) RPL glass dosimeter, commercially known as GD-301, b) lithium fluoride TLD-100 (LiF:Mg,Ti) and c) carbon-doped aluminum oxide (Al2O3:C). For this purpose, Monte Carlo simulations were applied, using the MCNP5 code to estimate the responses of these dosimeters in terms of absorbed dose, output factor, the angular and energy dependence. In the present study, we found that the differences between the output factors were less than -4:2% for all detector materials RPLGD, TLD and OSLD. The variations in sensitivity for angles up to -80 degrees from the central axis of the beam were approximately 0.5%, 0.8% and 1.5% for the TLD-100, GD-301 and Al2O3:C, respectively. The energy dependence of the RPL and OSL dosimeters are stated as less than a 2.2%, and within 5.8% for TLD.
机译:发光剂量计广泛用于临床实践,用于监测外部放射治疗中的患者剂量。最常见的三个剂量计类别是热发光(TLDS),放射线发光(RPLS)和光刺激的发光(OSL),其性质上具有相似的物理过程。本研究的目的是比较和评估三个特定发光探测器的剂量计特性:a)RPL玻璃剂量计,商业上称为GD-301,b)氟化物TLD-100锂(LIF:MG,MG,TI)和C )氧化碳氧化铝(Al2O3:C)。为此,使用MCNP5代码应用了蒙特卡洛模拟,以吸收剂量,输出因子,角度和能量依赖性来估计这些剂量计的响应。在本研究中,我们发现所有检测材料RPLGD,TLD和OSLD的输出因子之间的差异小于-4:2%。与梁的中央轴最高-80度的敏感性的变化约为0.5%,0.8%和1.5%,TLD-100,GD-301和AL2O3:C分别为C。 RPL和OSL剂量计的能量依赖性表示为2.2%,而TLD为5.8%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号