...
首页> 外文期刊>Agro Economist >Economic Feasibility of Parallel Education Policies in India
【24h】

Economic Feasibility of Parallel Education Policies in India

机译:平行教育政策的经济可行性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

As per the survey by ASSOCHAM, about 87 per cent of primary school children and up to 95 per cent of high school students received private tutoring in metro cities. This paper is prepared on basis of conditions and challenges a student is facing because of his educational needs and aspirations. It strived to get into the causes and consequence of following two platforms i.e. Government /Private aided or unaided schools and Private tuitions centers/coaching institutions. As these both supplement the learning of a student but somehow this policy is not having favorable outcomes. It has found a student academic schedule prolonged and absence of proper sphere to show his creativity or to present his innovative ideas ultimately adversely affecting his overall development leading to degradation of valuable human resources. This paper also focused towards the growing market of private tutors and coaching institutions to cater the demand of students who see as an option to earn livelihood or profit puttingadditional burden on the family budget. It has further incorporated the views and opinions of school teachers & parents, taking note of their concern.
机译:根据Assocham的调查,约有87%的小学生和多达95%的高中生在都会城市获得了私人辅导。本文是根据学生的教育需求和愿望而面临的条件和挑战。它努力了解遵循两个平台的原因和后果,即政府 /私人辅助学校或无助的学校以及私人学费中心 /教练机构。因为这两者都补充了学生的学习,但以某种方式没有有利的结果。它发现学生的学术时间表延长和缺乏适当的领域来展示他的创造力,或者提出他的创新思想最终会对他的整体发展产生不利影响,从而导致宝贵人力资源的退化。本文还集中在私人辅导员和教练机构的不断增长的市场上,以满足学生的需求,这些学生认为这是在家庭预算中赚取生计或利润的一种选择。它进一步纳入了学校教师和父母的观点和观点,并注意到了他们的关注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号