...
首页> 外文期刊>APMIS: Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica >Evaluation of two tuberculosis PCR assays for routine use in a clinical setting of low population and low tuberculosis prevalence
【24h】

Evaluation of two tuberculosis PCR assays for routine use in a clinical setting of low population and low tuberculosis prevalence

机译:评估两种结核病PCR分析,用于在临床情况下常规使用低,结核病患病率较低

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Today, there are numerous different molecular diagnostic assays for the detection of tuberculosis (TB), allowing the optimization of rapid detection of TB according to the clinical need. In this study, two high-throughput TB PCR assays with combined antimicrobial resistance detection, Anyplex (TM) II MTB/MDR (Seegene) and RealTime MTB + RealTime MTB RIF/INH Resistance (Abbott Molecular), were evaluated for routine use in a clinical setting of low population and low TB prevalence in Finland. The RealTime MTB assay was 100% concordant (22/22 positive, n = 169) with the reference methods (culture and Xpert MTB/RIF PCR assay, Cepheid). However, with a limitation of four separate PCR cycles per kit, the routine use in a low TB-prevalence setting would easily lead to wasting most of the RIF/INH Resistance reagents. The Anyplex (TM) II MTB/MDR assay usability was more adaptive to suit the clinical setting but the assay sensitivity was considerably lower (86%, 19/22 positive, n = 76) being closer to the sensitivity of smear microscopy. The findings of this study suggest that the evaluated high-throughput MTB/MDR assays are evidently suboptimal for routine use in a low population, low TB-prevalence setting. In addition, neither of the two assays covers non-tuberculous mycobacteria and could therefore not fully replace acid-fast staining as the initial screening method.
机译:如今,有许多不同的分子诊断测定法以检测结核病(TB),可以根据临床需求优化TB的快速检测。在这项研究中,对两种具有抗菌耐药性检测的高通量TB PCR分析,任何复合物(TM)II MTB/MDR(Seegene)和实时MTB +实时MTB +实时MTB RIF/INH抗性(Abbott Molecular),以在A中进行例行使用芬兰人口低和结核病患病率低的临床环境。实时MTB测定法与参考方法(培养和XPERT MTB/RIF PCR分析,CepheID)为100%一致(22/22阳性,n = 169)。但是,在每个套件的四个单独的PCR循环的限制下,在低结核病率设置中的常规使用将很容易导致浪费大多数RIF/INH电阻试剂。 Anyplex(TM)II MTB/MDR分析可用性更适合适合临床环境,但是测定敏感性较低(86%,19/22阳性,n = 76)更接近涂片显微镜的灵敏度。这项研究的结果表明,评估的高通量MTB/MDR分析显然是在低人口,低TB偏差的情况下常规使用的次优。此外,这两个测定方法均未涵盖无结核分枝杆菌,因此不能完全代替作为初始筛选方法的酸性染色。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号