首页> 外文期刊>Acta Physiologica Hungarica: A Periodical of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences >Influence of continuous or intermittent blood flow restriction on muscle activation during low-intensity multiple sets of resistance exercise.
【24h】

Influence of continuous or intermittent blood flow restriction on muscle activation during low-intensity multiple sets of resistance exercise.

机译:低强度多组阻力运动中连续或间歇性血流限制对肌肉激活的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Low-intensity resistance exercise with blood flow restriction (BFR) has been shown to induce a prominent increase in muscle activation in response to muscle fatigue. However, the magnitude of muscle fatigue between continuous (Con-BFR) and intermittent BFR (Int-BFR, BFR only during exercise) is currently unknown. We examined the effect of Con-BFR or Int-BFR on muscle activation during exercise. Unilateral arm curl exercise (20% of one-repetition maximum, four sets, 30 sec rest period between sets) was performed without (CON) or with Con-BFR or Int-BFR. During BFR conditions, the cuff was inflated to 160 mmHg on the proximal region of testing arm. Surface electromyography (EMG) was recorded from the biceps brachii muscle, and integrated EMG (iEMG) was analyzed. During the exercise, iEMG increased progressively in Con-BFR and Int-BFR and both conditions were greater (p < 0.05) than CON at the 3rd and 4th set. However, there were no differences (p > 0.05) in iEMG between Con-BFR and Int-BFR during exercise (~2.45 and ~2.40 times, respectively). Thus, the magnitude of increase in muscle activation may be similar between Con-BFR and Int-BFR when BFR exercise was performed at a high level of cuff pressure intensity.
机译:带有血流限制(BFR)的低强度抵抗运动已显示出对肌肉疲劳的响应,从而引起肌肉激活的显着增加。但是,目前尚不知道连续(Con-BFR)和间歇性BFR(Int-BFR,仅运动期间的BFR)之间的肌肉疲劳程度。我们检查了Con-BFR或Int-BFR对运动过程中肌肉激活的影响。不使用(CON)或使用Con-BFR或Int-BFR进行单侧手臂弯曲运动(一次重复最大值的20%,四组,每组之间的休息时间为30秒)。在BFR条件下,将袖带在测试臂的近端区域充气至160 mmHg。从肱二头肌记录表面肌电图(EMG),并分析整合肌电图(iEMG)。在运动过程中,Con-BFR和Int-BFR中的iEMG逐渐增加,并且在第3组和第4组中,两种情况都比CON大(p <0.05)。但是,运动期间Con-BFR和Int-BFR之间的iEMG没有差异(p> 0.05)(分别为〜2.45和〜2.40倍)。因此,当在高水平的袖带压力强度下进行BFR锻炼时,Con-BFR和Int-BFR之间的肌肉激活增加幅度可能相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号