...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and vaccine immunology: CVI >Comparison of the Immunogenicity and Safety of the Conventional Subunit, MF59-Adjuvanted, and Intradermal Influenza Vaccines in the Elderly
【24h】

Comparison of the Immunogenicity and Safety of the Conventional Subunit, MF59-Adjuvanted, and Intradermal Influenza Vaccines in the Elderly

机译:传统亚基的免疫原性和安全性,MF59辅助和皮内流感疫苗的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The influenza vaccination is known as the most effective method for preventing influenza infection and its complications in the elderly. Conventional subunit (Agrippal S1; Novartis), MF59-adjuvanted (Fluad; Novartis), and intradermal (IDflu15; Sanofi Pasteur) influenza vaccines are widely used throughout South Korea. However, few comparative studies evaluating the safety and immunogenicity of these vaccines are available. Prior to the beginning of the 2011-2012 influenza season, 335 healthy elderly volunteers randomly received one of three seasonal trivalent influenza vaccines, the conventional subunit, MF59-adjuvanted, or intradermal influenza vaccine. Serum hemagglutination-inhibiting antibody levels were measured at the time of vaccination and at 1 and 6 months after vaccination. Adverse events were recorded prospectively. A total of 113 conventional subunit, 111 MF59-adjuvanted, and 111 intradermal influenza vaccine volunteers were followed up during a 6-month postvaccination period. One month after vaccination, all three vaccines satisfied Committee for Medical Products for Human Use (CHMP) immunogenicity criteria for the A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 strains but not for the B strain. Compared with the subunit vaccine, the intradermal vaccine exhibited noninferiority, while the MF59-adjuvanted vaccine exhibited superiority. Furthermore, the MF59-adjuvanted vaccine was more immunogenic against the A/H3N2 strain than was the subunit vaccine up to 6 months postvaccination. The most common local and systemic reactions to the conventional subunit, MF59-adjuvanted, and intradermal influenza vaccines were pain at the injection site (7.1%, 10.8%, and 6.3%, respectively) and generalized myalgia (0.9%, 8.1%, and 5.4%, respectively). Local and systemic reactions were similar among the three vaccine groups. MF59-adjuvanted vaccine exhibited superior immunogenicity compared with a conventional subunit vaccine and had a comparable safety profile. For older adults, the MF59-adjuvanted vaccine is preferable for providing superior immunogenicity.
机译:流感疫苗被称为预防流感感染及其老年人并发症的最有效方法。常规亚基(Agrippal S1; Novartis),MF59-Adjuvant(Fluad; Novartis)和皮内(IDFLU15; Sanofi Pasteur)流感疫苗在整个韩国广泛使用。但是,很少有评估这些疫苗安全性和免疫原性的比较研究。在2011-2012流感季节开始之前,有335名健康的老年志愿者随机接收了三种季节性三价流感疫苗之一,即常规亚基,MF59辅助疫苗或支药内流感疫苗。在疫苗接种时和疫苗接种后的1和6个月时测量血清血凝性抑制抗体水平。前瞻性记录不良事件。在6个月后,总共有113个常规亚基,111个MF59-Adjuvant和111个皮内流感疫苗疫苗志愿者。疫苗接种后一个月,所有三种疫苗都满足了针对A/H1N1和A/H3N2菌株的人类使用的医学产品委员会(CHMP)免疫原性标准,但对B菌株却不。与亚基疫苗相比,皮内疫苗表现出非劣质性,而MF59辅助疫苗表现出优势。此外,与A/H3N2菌株相比,MF59辅助疫苗对A/H3N2菌株具有更大的免疫原性,比疫苗接种后6个月的亚基疫苗。对常规亚基的最常见和全身反应,MF59辅助剂和皮内流感疫苗是注射部位的疼痛(分别为7.1%,10.8%和6.3%),并且概括性肌痛(0.9%,8.1%和8.1%和8.1%和8.1%和8.1%和8.1%和8.1%和分别为5.4%)。三个疫苗组之间的局部和全身反应相似。与常规亚基疫苗相比,MF59辅助疫苗具有优异的免疫原性,并且具有可比的安全性。对于老年人,MF59辅助疫苗优于提供优质的免疫原性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号