首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Emergency Medicine: Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians and the University Association for Emergency Medicine >A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing central laboratory and point-of-care cardiac marker testing strategies: the Disposition Impacted by Serial Point of Care Markers in Acute Coronary Syndromes (DISPO-ACS) trial.
【24h】

A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing central laboratory and point-of-care cardiac marker testing strategies: the Disposition Impacted by Serial Point of Care Markers in Acute Coronary Syndromes (DISPO-ACS) trial.

机译:一项多中心随机对照试验,比较了中央实验室和即时医疗点心脏标志物测试策略:急性冠状动脉综合征(DISPO-ACS)试验中连续性医疗点标志物的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Point-of-care testing reduces time to cardiac marker results in patients evaluated for acute coronary syndromes, yet evidence this translates to a decreased length of stay is lacking. We hypothesized that point-of-care testing decreases length of stay in patients being evaluated for acute coronary syndromes in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: Patients being evaluated for possible acute coronary syndromes at 4 EDs in the United States were randomized to having point-of-care markers as well as central laboratory markers, or central laboratory markers only (laboratory arm). Point-of-care markers were obtained using early serial testing at presentation and at 90, 180, and 360 minutes as required by the treating physician. Evaluation, treatment, and disposition decisions were at the treating physician's discretion. Length of stay was from presentation to the time of departure from the ED, either to an inpatient setting or to home. RESULTS: There were 1,000 patients in each study arm.There were 520 patients discharged home from the ED. Median (interquartile range) time to discharge home was 4.6 hours (3.5 to 6.1 hours) in laboratory patients and 4.5 hours (3.5 to 6.1 hours) in point-of-care patients. Median (interquartile range) time to transfer to an inpatient setting for admitted patients was 5.5 hours (4.2 to 7.5 hours) in laboratory patients, and 5.4 hours (4.1 to 7.3 hours) in point-of-care patients. At one site, time to transfer to the floor was reduced in the point-of-care arm compared with the laboratory arm (difference in medians 0.45 hours; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.14 to 1.04 hours). At one site, time to ED departure for discharged patients was higher in the point-of-care arm than the laboratory arm (difference in medians 1.25 hours; 95% CI 0.13 to 2.36 hours). CONCLUSION: The effect of point-of-care testing on length of stay in the ED varies between settings. At one site, point-of-care testing decreased time to admission, whereas at another, point-of-care testing increased time to discharge. Potential effects of point-of-care testing on patient throughput should be considered in the full context of ED operations.
机译:研究目的:现场护理测试可缩短接受急性冠脉综合征评估的患者获得心脏标志物的时间,但尚缺乏证据表明可缩短住院时间。我们假设在急诊科(ED)中进行即时护理测试可缩短接受评估的急性冠脉综合征患者的住院时间。方法:在美国4 ED处接受可能的急性冠脉综合征评估的患者被随机分配为具有现场护理标记以及中心实验室标记,或仅具有中心实验室标记(实验室用臂)。即时护理标记是根据治疗医师的要求,在就诊时以及90、180和360分钟时使用早期连续测试获得的。评估,治疗和处置决定由主治医师决定。住院时间是从就诊到离开急诊室的时间,无论是住院时间还是回家时间。结果:每个研究组中有1,000名患者,其中520名患者从ED出院回家。实验室患者的出院中位时间(四分位间距)为4.6小时(3.5至6.1小时),即时护理患者为4.5小时(3.5至6.1小时)。住院患者转移到住院环境的中位(四分位数间距)时间为5.5小时(4.2至7.5小时),即时护理患者为5.4小时(4.1至7.3小时)。与实验室部门相比,在一个站点上,现场护理部门转移到地板的时间减少了(中位数差异0.45小时; 95%置信区间[CI] -0.14至1.04小时)。在一个站点上,出院患者的ED离开时间比即时医疗服务点高出实验室点(中位数差异1.25小时; 95%CI为0.13至2.36小时)。结论:现场护理测试对急诊室住院时间的影响因设置而异。在一个地点,现场检查减少了入院时间,而在另一个地点,现场检查增加了出院时间。在急诊室操作的全部环境中,应考虑现场护理测试对患者通量的潜在影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号