首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Emergency Medicine: Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians and the University Association for Emergency Medicine >Is the combination of negative computed tomography result and negative lumbar puncture result sufficient to rule out subarachnoid hemorrhage?
【24h】

Is the combination of negative computed tomography result and negative lumbar puncture result sufficient to rule out subarachnoid hemorrhage?

机译:计算机断层扫描结果阴性和腰椎穿刺结果阴性相结合是否足以排除蛛网膜下腔出血?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Current clinical practice assumes a negative computed tomography (CT) head scan result and a negative lumbar puncture result together are adequate to rule out subarachnoid hemorrhage in patients with acute headache. Our objective is to determine the sensitivity of a negative CT result combined with a negative lumbar puncture result to exclude subarachnoid hemorrhage. METHODS: This prospective cohort study was conducted at 2 tertiary care emergency departments (EDs) during 3 years. We enrolled all patients who were older than 15 years, had a nontraumatic acute headache and normal neurologic examination result, and who had a CT head scan and a lumbar puncture if the CT result was negative (ie, no blood in the subarachnoid space). Patients were followed up with a structured telephone questionnaire 6 to 36 months after their ED visit and electronic hospital records review to ensure no missed subarachnoid hemorrhage. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios of the strategy of CT and then lumbar puncture for subarachnoid hemorrhage. RESULTS: Five hundred ninety-two patients were enrolled, including 61 with subarachnoid hemorrhage. The mean patient age was 43.6 years, with 59.1% female patients. All cases of subarachnoid hemorrhage were identified on initial CT or lumbar puncture. One patient without subarachnoid hemorrhage was subsequently diagnosed with cerebral aneurysm, requiring surgery. The strategy classified patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage with sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios (with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) of 100% (95% CI 94% to 100%), 67% (95% CI 63% to 71%), 3.03 (95% CI 2.69 to 3.53), and 0. For diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage or aneurysm, these were 98% (95% CI 91% to 100%), 67% (95% CI 63% to 71%), 2.98 (95% CI 2.63 to 3.38), and 0.02 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.17), respectively. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the largest prospective study evaluating the accuracy of a strategy of CT and lumbar puncture torule out subarachnoid hemorrhage in alert ED patients with an acute headache. This study validates clinical practice that a negative CT with a negative lumbar puncture is sufficient to rule out subarachnoid hemorrhage.
机译:研究目的:目前的临床实践假设计算机断层扫描(CT)头扫描结果阴性和腰穿刺结果阴性,足以排除急性头痛患者的蛛网膜下腔出血。我们的目标是确定CT阴性结果与腰穿刺阴性结果相结合的敏感性,以排除蛛网膜下腔出血。方法:这项前瞻性队列研究是在3年中在2个三级急诊科进行的。我们纳入了所有15岁以上,无创伤性急性头痛且神经系统检查结果正常的患者,如果CT结果为阴性(即蛛网膜下腔无血),则进行了CT头扫描和腰穿。急诊就诊后6至36个月,对患者进行了结构化的电话问卷调查,并检查了电子医院记录,以确保没有漏诊蛛网膜下腔出血。我们计算了CT策略然后腰穿治疗蛛网膜下腔出血的敏感性,特异性和似然比。结果:592例患者入选,其中61例蛛网膜下腔出血。患者平均年龄为43.6岁,女性患者为59.1%。所有的蛛网膜下腔出血病例都是在最初的CT或腰穿时发现的。随后一名无蛛网膜下腔出血的患者被诊断出患有脑动脉瘤,需要手术治疗。该策略将蛛网膜下腔出血患者的敏感性,特异性和阳性和阴性可能性比(95%置信区间[CIs])分别为100%(95%CI 94%至100%),67%(95%CI 63%)至71%),3.03(95%CI 2.69至3.53)和0。对于诊断蛛网膜下腔出血或动脉瘤,分别为98%(95%CI 91%至100%),67%(95%CI 63%至95%CI。 71%),2.98(95%CI 2.63至3.38)和0.02(95%CI 0.00至0.17)。结论:据我们所知,这是一项最大的前瞻性研究,评估了CT和腰椎穿刺策略可消除机敏的ED急性头痛患者的蛛网膜下腔出血。这项研究验证了临床实践,即CT阴性和腰穿刺阴性足以排除蛛网膜下腔出血。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号