...
首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology >Comparison of FEA simulations and experimental results for as-built additively manufactured dogbone specimens
【24h】

Comparison of FEA simulations and experimental results for as-built additively manufactured dogbone specimens

机译:FEA模拟和实验结果对底座制造的狗骨标本的比较和实验结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Parts built using fused deposition modeling (FDM-an additive manufacturing technology) differ from their design model in terms of their microstructure and material properties. These differences lead to a certain amount of ambiguity regarding the structure, strength, and stiffness of the final FDM part. Increasing use of FDM parts as end use products necessitates accurate simulations and analyses during part design. However, analysis methods such as finite element analysis, are used for analysis of continuum models, and may not accurately represent the non-continuous non-linear FDM parts. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the accuracy and precision of FEA for FDM parts. The goal of this study is to compare FEA simulations of the as-built geometries with the experimental tests of actual FDM parts. Dogbone geometries that include different infill patterns are tested under tensile loading and later simulated using FEA. This study found that FEA results are not always an accurate or reliable means of predicting FDM part behaviors.
机译:在微观结构和材料性能方面,使用熔融沉积建模(FDM,一种添加剂制造技术)制造的零件与其设计模型不同。这些差异导致最终FDM零件的结构、强度和刚度存在一定程度的模糊性。FDM零件作为终端产品的使用越来越多,这就需要在零件设计过程中进行精确的模拟和分析。然而,有限元分析等分析方法用于分析连续介质模型,可能无法准确表示非连续非线性FDM零件。因此,有必要确定FDM零件有限元分析的精度和精度。本研究的目的是将竣工几何的有限元模拟与实际FDM零件的实验测试进行比较。包括不同填充模式的狗骨几何结构在拉伸载荷下进行测试,然后使用FEA进行模拟。本研究发现,FEA结果并不总是预测FDM零件行为的准确或可靠方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号