首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Predictive Value of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score for Survival and Ambulatory Function After Surgery for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression in 110 Patients with Prostate Cancer
【24h】

Predictive Value of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score for Survival and Ambulatory Function After Surgery for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression in 110 Patients with Prostate Cancer

机译:110例前列腺癌术后转移性脊髓压缩术后脊柱不稳定肿瘤分数的预测值。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Study Design.. We retrospectively analyzed Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) in 110 patients with prostate cancer operated for metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). Objective.. We aimed to investigate the association between SINS and clinical outcomes after surgery for MSCC in patients with prostate cancer. Summary of Background Data.. The SINS is a useful tool for assessing tumor-related spinal instability, but its prognostic value regarding survival and neurological outcome is still controversial. Methods.. We analyzed 110 consecutive patients with prostate cancer who underwent surgery for MSCC. The patients were categorized according to their SINS. Patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC, n = 84) and those with hormone-naive disease (n = 26) were analyzed separately. Results.. In total, 106 of 110 patients met the SINS criteria for potential instability or instability (scores 7-18). The median SINS was 10 (range 6-15) for patients with CRPC and 9 (7-16) for hormone-naive patients. In the CRPC group, the SINS was classified as stable (score 0-6) in 4 patients, as potentially unstable (score 7-12) in 70 patients, and as unstable (score 13-18) in 10 patients. In the hormone-naive group, 22 patients met the SINS criteria for potential instability and 4 patients for instability. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall risk for death between the SINS potentially unstable and unstable categories (adjusted hazard ratio 1.3, P = 0.4), or in the risk of loss of ambulation 1 month after surgery (adjusted odds ratio 1.4, P = 0.6). Conclusion.. The SINS is helpful in assessing spinal instability when selecting patients for surgery, but it does not predict survival or neurological outcomes. Patients with a potential spinal instability benefit equally from surgery for MSCC as do patients with spinal instability.
机译:研究设计。。我们回顾性分析了110例因转移性脊髓压迫症(MSCC)手术的前列腺癌患者的脊柱不稳定性肿瘤评分(SINS)。客观的我们的目的是研究前列腺癌患者MSCC术后SINS与临床结果之间的关系。背景数据摘要。。SINS是评估肿瘤相关脊柱不稳定的有用工具,但其对生存和神经系统预后的价值仍有争议。方法。。我们分析了110例连续接受MSCC手术的前列腺癌患者。这些病人是根据他们的罪行分类的。分别对去势耐受性前列腺癌(CRPC,n=84)和激素缺乏性前列腺癌(n=26)患者进行分析。后果总的来说,110名患者中有106名符合SINS潜在不稳定或不稳定的标准(得分7-18)。CRPC患者的SINS中位数为10(范围6-15),激素缺乏患者的SINS中位数为9(7-16)。在CRPC组中,4名患者的SINS分类为稳定(评分0-6),70名患者的SINS分类为潜在不稳定(评分7-12),10名患者的SINS分类为不稳定(评分13-18)。在激素未使用组中,22名患者符合SINS潜在不稳定性标准,4名患者符合不稳定性标准。SINS潜在不稳定和不稳定类别之间的总体死亡风险(调整后的危险比1.3,P=0.4)或术后1个月失去活动能力的风险(调整后的优势比1.4,P=0.6)在统计学上没有显著差异。结论当选择患者进行手术时,SINS有助于评估脊柱不稳定性,但它不能预测生存率或神经结果。与脊柱不稳患者一样,潜在脊柱不稳患者也同样受益于MSCC手术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号