首页> 外文期刊>Annals of vascular surgery >Results of single- and two-vessel mesenteric artery stents for chronic mesenteric ischemia.
【24h】

Results of single- and two-vessel mesenteric artery stents for chronic mesenteric ischemia.

机译:单支和两支肠系膜动脉支架治疗慢性肠系膜缺血的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: To describe the outcomes of single- and two-vessel mesenteric artery stents in patients with chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI). METHODS: We reviewed 101 patients (41 men and 60 women; mean age, 73 +/- 13 years) treated with mesenteric artery stents for atherosclerotic CMI between 1998 and 2008. Clinical data and outcomes were reviewed in patients treated with single superior mesenteric artery (SMA) stent (group A) or two-vessel celiac artery (CA) and SMA stent (group B). Isolated CA stenting was analyzed as a separate group (group C). End-points were taken as differences in morbidity and mortality and freedom from recurrent symptoms and reinterventions. RESULTS: There were 61 patients in group A, 24 in group B, and 16 in group C. All three groups had similar demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, and clinical presentation. There were no differences in early mortality (2%, 4%, and 0%), morbidity (18%, 26%, and 12%), and symptom relief (95%, 78%, and 100%) between groups A, B, and C, respectively (p value was not significant). Mean follow-up was 41 +/- 17 months. Freedom for reintervention at 1 and 3 years was similar among patients in groups A (86 +/- 5% and 50 +/- 9%), B (67 +/- 11% and 67 +/- 11%), and C (63 +/- 13% and 63 +/- 13%), respectively (p value was not significant). There were no significant differences in freedom from restenosis at 1 and 3 years among patients in groups A (54 +/- 7% and 44 +/- 9%), B (47 +/- 12% and 39 +/- 12%), and C (43 +/- 13% and 34 +/- 13%), respectively. Primary and secondary patency rates at 3 years were 57% and 96% for SMA and 61% and 87% for CA stents, respectively (p value was not significant). CA stent alone was associated with symptom recurrence in 6 of 16 patients (38%), as compared with the recurrence rate of 18% (11 of 61) in patients who underwent SMA stent placement (p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Two-vessel CA and SMA stenting do not reduce the incidence of recurrent symptoms or reinterventions when compared with single-vessel SMA stents in patients with CMI. CA stent alone carries a high risk of recurrence.
机译:背景:描述慢性肠系膜缺血(CMI)患者的单支和两支肠系膜动脉支架的结果。方法:我们回顾了1998年至2008年间使用肠系膜动脉支架治疗动脉粥样硬化CMI的101例患者(41例男性和60例女性,平均年龄73 +/- 13岁)。对单根肠系膜上动脉治疗的患者的临床数据和结局进行了回顾(SMA)支架(A组)或两支腹腔动脉(CA)和SMA支架(B组)。孤立的CA支架置入作为一个独立的组进行分析(C组)。终点被认为是发病率和死亡率的差异,并且没有复发症状和再次干预的差异。结果:A组61例,B组24例,C组16例。所有三个组的人口统计学,心血管危险因素和临床表现均相似。 A组之间的早期死亡率(2%,4%和0%),发病率(18%,26%和12%)和症状缓解(95%,78%和100%)没有差异,分别为B和C(p值不显着)。平均随访时间为41 +/- 17个月。 A组(86 +/- 5%和50 +/- 9%),B组(67 +/- 11%和67 +/- 11%)和C组患者的1年和3年再次干预自由相似(分别为63 +/- 13%和63 +/- 13%)(p值不显着)。 A组(54 +/- 7%和44 +/- 9%),B组(47 +/- 12%和39 +/- 12%)的患者在1年和3年的无再狭窄方面无显着差异)和C(分别为43 +/- 13%和34 +/- 13%)。 SMA在3年时的初次和二次通畅率分别为57%和96%,CA支架分别为61%和87%(p值不显着)。 16例患者中有6例(38%)单独使用CA支架与症状复发相关,而SMA支架置入的患者中18%(61例中有11例)复发率更高(p = 0.06)。结论:CMI患者与单支SMA支架相比,两支CA和SMA支架不能降低复发症状或再次介入的发生率。单独使用CA支架有很高的复发风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号