...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials >Comparison in clinical performance of surgical guides for mandibular surgery and temporomandibular joint implants fabricated by additive manufacturing techniques
【24h】

Comparison in clinical performance of surgical guides for mandibular surgery and temporomandibular joint implants fabricated by additive manufacturing techniques

机译:颌骨外科手术指南的临床表现比较和添加剂制造技术制造的颞下颌关节植入物

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Additive manufacturing (AM) offers great design freedom that enables objects with desired unique and complex geometry and topology to be readily and cost-effectively fabricated. The overall benefits of AM are well known, such as increased material and resource efficiency, enhanced design and production flexibility, the ability to create porous structures and on-demand manufacturing. When AM is applied to medical devices, these benefits are naturally assumed. However, hard clinical evidence collected from clinical trials and studies seems to be lacking and, as a result, systematic assessment is yet difficult. In the present work, we have reviewed 23 studies on the clinical use of AM patient-specific surgical guides (PSGs) for the mandible surgeries (n = 17) and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) patient-specific implants (PSIs) (n = 6) with respect to expected clinical outcomes. It is concluded that the data published on these AM medical devices are often lacking in comprehensive evaluation of clinical outcomes. A complete set of clinical data, including those on time management, costs, clinical outcomes, range of motion, accuracy of the placement with respect to the pre-operative planning, and extra complications, as well as manufacturing data are needed to demonstrate the real benefits gained from applying AM to these medical devices and to satisfy regulatory requirements.
机译:增材制造(AM)提供了极大的设计自由度,使具有所需独特复杂几何结构和拓扑结构的物体能够容易且经济高效地制造。AM的整体好处是众所周知的,例如提高材料和资源效率、增强设计和生产灵活性、创建多孔结构的能力和按需制造。当AM应用于医疗设备时,自然会假定这些好处。然而,从临床试验和研究中收集到的确凿的临床证据似乎是缺乏的,因此,系统的评估仍然是困难的。在目前的工作中,我们回顾了23项关于AM患者特异性手术指南(PSG)在下颌骨手术(n=17)和颞下颌关节(TMJ)患者特异性植入物(PSIs)(n=6)中的临床应用的研究,以期获得预期的临床结果。结论是,在这些AM医疗设备上公布的数据往往缺乏对临床结果的综合评估。需要一套完整的临床数据,包括时间管理、成本、临床结果、活动范围、与术前计划有关的放置准确性、额外并发症,以及制造数据,以证明将AM应用于这些医疗设备的真正好处,并满足监管要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号