首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Stored Products Research >Establishing the value of modern seed storage methods for wheat in diverse production ecologies in Nepal
【24h】

Establishing the value of modern seed storage methods for wheat in diverse production ecologies in Nepal

机译:在尼泊尔各种生产生态中建立现代种子储存方法的价值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the developing-country context of Nepal, farmers often incur seed losses of 15-30% due to improper storage. To evaluate the efficacy and costs of modern storage alternatives, experimental trials were set up among ten farmers each in two contrasting ecologies, i.e. Palpa (hills) and Rupandehi (terai plains) districts of Nepal in 2013. Several wheat seed storage options were contrasted including farmer practices (FP) such as reused fertilizer bags, polythene bags, household metal containers, and mud bins. Modern storage methods that were evaluated included plastic bags (with and without pesticide), metal bins, and hermetic 'SuperGrain bag' (SGB). Seed quality and losses were assessed after six months of storage (May-October) with parameters such as grain moisture content, insect damage, seed germination, and seedling vigor. The overall quality of seed with FPs was lower in the hills than in the terai plains. Among the treatments, SGBs were more effective in maintaining acceptable seed moisture levels, controlling insect damage (&1%), preserving germination (&90% lab, &65% field), and promoting seedling vigor. Metal bins and plastic bags without pesticide had higher insect damage (7-15%) compared to FP and plastic bags with pesticide (2-5%). In terms of storage costs, SGBs were comparable with the farmers' storage methods ($5-6 per 100 kg seed storage). Our findings demonstrate that SGBs are better at maintaining seed quality and more economical than not only FP but also the other modern storage methods evaluated in this study across production ecologies in Nepal. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在尼泊尔的发展中国家,由于储存不当,农民通常会损失15-30%的种子。为了评估现代储存替代品的功效和成本,2013年在尼泊尔帕尔帕(丘陵)和鲁潘德希(特莱平原)两个对比生态区的10名农民中进行了试验。比较了几种小麦种子储存方法,包括农民实践(FP),如重复使用的肥料袋、聚乙烯袋、家用金属容器和泥箱。经过评估的现代储存方法包括塑料袋(有农药和无农药)、金属箱和密封的“超级谷物袋”(SGB)。在储存六个月(5月至10月)后,用谷物含水量、虫害、种子发芽和幼苗活力等参数评估种子质量和损失。在山区,FPs种子的总体质量低于特莱平原。在这些处理中,SGB在维持可接受的种子水分水平、控制虫害(小于1%)、保存发芽(大于90%的lab、大于65%的田间)和提高幼苗活力方面更有效。与FP和装有农药的塑料袋(2-5%)相比,不含农药的金属箱和塑料袋的虫害更大(7-15%)。就储存成本而言,SGB与农民的储存方法相当(每100公斤种子储存5-6美元)。我们的研究结果表明,SGB在保持种子质量方面比FP以及本研究中评估的尼泊尔生产生态系统中的其他现代贮藏方法更好,更经济。(C) 2018爱思唯尔有限公司版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号