...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >Muscle Strength Does Not Adapt From a Second to Third Bout of Eccentric Contractions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Repeated Bout Effect
【24h】

Muscle Strength Does Not Adapt From a Second to Third Bout of Eccentric Contractions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Repeated Bout Effect

机译:肌肉力量不适应偏心收缩的第二个至第三次偏离偏离:对重复的回合效应的系统回顾和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The greatest muscle strength adaptations to repeated bouts of eccentric contractions (ECC) occur after the initial injury, with little to no change in subsequent bouts. However, because of the disparity in injury models, it is unknown whether three or more bouts provide further adaptation. Therefore, we performed a systematic review of the literature to evaluate whether a third bout of skeletal muscle ECC impacts immediate strength loss and rate of strength recovery compared with a second bout. A search of the literature in Web of Science, SCOPUS, Medline, and the American College of Sports Medicine database was conducted between May and September 2019 using the keywords eccentric contraction or lengthening contraction and muscle and repeated or multiple, and bout. Eleven studies with 12 experimental groups, using 72 human subjects, 48 mice, and 11 rabbits, met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis using a random effects model and effect sizes (ESs; Hedges' g) calculated from the standardized mean differences was completed. Calculated ESs for immediate strength loss provided no evidence that a third bout of ECC results in greater loss of strength compared with a second bout (ES = -0.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.41 to 0.17). Furthermore, the rate of strength recovery was not different between a second and third bout (ES = -0.15, 95% CI = -1.01 to 0.70). These results indicate a third bout of skeletal muscle ECC does not improve indices of strength loss or rate of strength recovery compared with a second bout. Therefore, coaches and athletes should expect some level of persistent weakness after each of their initial training sessions involving ECC, and the faster recovery of strength deficits in the second bout documented by previous research is not different from a third bout.
机译:对反复的离心收缩(ECC)的最大肌力适应发生在最初的损伤后,在随后的几次发作中几乎没有变化。然而,由于损伤模型的差异,尚不清楚三次或更多的比赛是否能提供进一步的适应。因此,我们对文献进行了系统回顾,以评估与第二轮相比,第三轮骨骼肌ECC是否会影响即刻力量损失和力量恢复率。2019年5月至9月,在科学网、SCOPUS、Medline和美国运动医学院数据库中进行了文献搜索,使用关键词偏心收缩或延长收缩和肌肉、重复或多次、以及bout。共有12个实验组的11项研究,包括72名受试者、48只小鼠和11只兔子,符合纳入标准。使用随机效应模型和根据标准化均值差异计算的效应大小(ESs;Hedges’g)进行荟萃分析。计算出的即刻力量损失的ESs没有证据表明第三轮ECC比第二轮ECC导致更大的力量损失(ES=-0.12,95%置信区间[CI]=-0.41至0.17)。此外,第二轮和第三轮之间的力量恢复率没有差异(ES=-0.15,95%CI=-1.01至0.70)。这些结果表明,与第二轮相比,第三轮骨骼肌ECC并没有改善力量损失指数或力量恢复率。因此,教练和运动员在每次涉及ECC的初始训练课程后都应该预计会出现一定程度的持续性虚弱,之前研究记录的第二回合力量不足的更快恢复与第三回合并无不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号