首页> 外文期刊>Design Ecologies >Colonizing islands
【24h】

Colonizing islands

机译:殖民群岛

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

When Edward Said spoke of an ‘imaginative geography’, it was both to question the geographic positions adopted as part of colonial accounts and to posit the role of imagination itself in the construction of geographies. For Said, the ‘dramatic boundaries’ ofimaginative geography are at once abstract and mobile, and yet might constitute ‘a form of radical realism’. The discourse is thus at once about perspective, position and the empirical (and imperial) imposition of that which is speculative, literary and fluid. But it is also aboutthe unmediated engagements of radical realism and a form of geography we can only imagine. This article turns to the imaginative geography of islands and takes three islands as its departure point. The first is the island of Gilles Deleuze’s article ‘Desert islands’ (2004),an island ‘toward which one drifts’. The second is the island of absent subjectivity that is explored in Jean Baudrillard’s extended essay Why Hasn’t Everything Already Disappeared? (2009). The third island upon which this article fixates is perhaps more archipelagothan island. It is the spomeniki that are dotted over the landscape of the former Yugoslavia. These monuments were largely commissioned by Josip Broz Tito and built across the 1960s and 1970s and into the early 1980s to mark the places where the battles of the National Liberation War(Second World War) had occurred and where concentration camps had once stood. These monuments sit as odd and haunting gestures. Many sculptors and architects were involved. Some spomeniki are anchored and sit heavy on the landscape, as one might expect of memorials, and others appearto launch themselves towards elsewhere. Some are small and unimposing, and others at a scale well beyond the human body. Some are well tended, and others have faded into oblivion. This article turns specifically to the spomenik at the Valley of Heroes, Tjenti?te, designed bythe sculptor Miodrag ?ivovi? and completed in 1971. Like all the spomeniki, this monument has endured further war since its erection. This magnificent fractal concrete form marks the Battle of Sutjeska, but rather than fixate upon a singular geo-historical moment, it appearsmore likely to take flight. I will argue that this magnificent sculpture is perhaps engaged in what Baudrillard calls ‘the art of disappearance’.
机译:当爱德华·赛义德谈到“想象力的地理学”时,它既是对作为殖民地描述一部分的地理位置的质疑,也是对想象力本身在地理构造中的作用的假设。对于赛义德来说,想象中的地理的“戏剧性边界”既抽象又可移动,但可能构成“激进现实主义的一种形式”。因此,这篇论述同时是关于视角、立场和经验(以及帝国主义)强加给思辨性、文学性和流动性的东西。但它也与激进现实主义和一种我们只能想象的地理形式的不可调和的接触有关。本文转向富有想象力的岛屿地理,以三座岛屿为出发点。第一个是吉尔斯·德勒兹(Gilles Deleuze)2004年发表的文章《荒岛》(Desert islands),这是一个“漂流而去”的岛屿。第二个是在让·鲍德里亚的扩展文章《为什么一切还没有消失》中探讨的主体性缺失之岛?(2009). 本文关注的第三个岛屿可能是群岛,而不是岛屿。正是斯波梅尼基号点缀着前南斯拉夫的风景。这些纪念碑主要是由Josip Broz Tito委托修建的,建于20世纪60年代和70年代,一直持续到80年代初,以纪念民族解放战争(第二次世界大战)发生的地方和集中营曾经所在的地方。这些纪念碑的姿态古怪而令人难以忘怀。许多雕塑家和建筑师都参与其中。一些斯波美尼基人被锚定,沉重地坐在风景上,正如人们可能期望的那样,还有一些人似乎要向其他地方出发。有些是小而不起眼的,而另一些则远远超出了人体的范围。一些人得到了很好的照顾,另一些人则被遗忘了。这篇文章专门针对英雄谷的斯波梅尼克人,特詹蒂?是雕塑家Miodrag设计的吗?伊沃维?1971年完工。像所有的斯波门尼人一样,这座纪念碑自建立以来经历了进一步的战争。这座宏伟的分形混凝土建筑标志着萨特耶斯卡之战,但它并没有专注于一个独特的地理历史时刻,它似乎更有可能逃跑。我要说的是,这座宏伟的雕塑可能正从事着鲍德里亚所说的“消失的艺术”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号