首页> 外文期刊>Journal of radiological protection: Official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection >Estimation and comparison of the radiation effective dose during coronary computed tomography angiography examinations on single-source 64-MDCT and dual-source 128-MDCT
【24h】

Estimation and comparison of the radiation effective dose during coronary computed tomography angiography examinations on single-source 64-MDCT and dual-source 128-MDCT

机译:单源64-MDCT和双源128-MDCT冠状动脉计算机断层造影血管造影检查中辐射有效剂量的估算与比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Goal. To estimate and compare the radiation dose associated with coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) examinations on two multi-detector CT scanners (MDCT), 64-MDCT and 128-MDCT, in daily practice. Methods. Scan parameters of 90 patients undergoing retrospective electrocardiographic gating spiral CCTA exam were recorded during a period on a single-source 64-MDCT and a dual-source 128-MDCT, and average scan parameters were derived that were used for dosimetry. The computed tomography dose index (CTDI) with a pencil ionisation chamber and polymethyl methacrylate body phantom with diameter of 32 cm was measured on both scanners. The doselength product (DLP) was calculated and the DLP to effective dose conversion factor (for chest scan at 120 kV of 0.014 mSv mGy(-1) cm(-1)) was used to estimate effective dose (ED). Results. Patients' heart rate, scan length, pitch factor, CTDIv, DLP and ED for 128-MDCT were 64 (5) (beats min(-1)), 161 (10) (mm), 0.26, 47 (12) (mGy), 769 (212) (mGy cm) and 10.3 (3.1) (mSv), respectively [mean (one standard deviation)]. Patients' heart rate, scan length, pitch factor, CTDIv, DLP and ED for 64-MDCT were 60 (7) (beats min(-1)), 172 (14) (mm), 0.2, 60 (6) (mGy), 1068 (98) (mGy cm) and 14.9 (1.4) (mSv), respectively. Conclusion. Our results indicated that the CTDIv, DLP and the effective dose with 128-MDCT is significantly lower than with 64-MDCT (p < 0.05). As differences between the exposure parameter mAs on two CT scanners was not significant (p > 0.05) and the kV was constant for both scanners (120 kV), the differences resulted from a shorter scan length on the 128-MDCT and use of a higher pitch factor (0.26 and 0.2 in the 128-MDCT and 64-MDCT, respectively). Comparison with other published studies confirms the findings and indicates methods for reducing patient dose.
机译:球门在日常实践中,评估和比较两种多探测器CT扫描仪(64-MDCT和128-MDCT)上冠状动脉CT血管造影(CCTA)检查相关的辐射剂量。方法。在单源64-MDCT和双源128-MDCT上记录了90名接受回顾性心电门控螺旋CCTA检查的患者在一段时间内的扫描参数,并得出了用于剂量测定的平均扫描参数。使用铅笔电离室和直径为32cm的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯体模在两台扫描仪上测量计算机断层扫描剂量指数(CTDI)。计算剂量长度乘积(DLP),并使用DLP到有效剂量的转换系数(对于120 kV 0.014 mSv mGy(-1)cm(-1)的胸部扫描)来估计有效剂量(ED)。后果128-MDCT患者的心率、扫描长度、节距因子、CTDIv、DLP和ED分别为64(5)(最小跳动量(-1))、161(10)(毫米)、0.26、47(12)(mGy)、769(212)(mGy-cm)和10.3(3.1)(mSv)[平均值(一个标准偏差)]。64-MDCT患者的心率、扫描长度、节距因子、CTDIv、DLP和ED分别为60(7)(分钟(-1))、172(14)(毫米)、0.2、60(6)(mGy)、1068(98)(mGy-cm)和14.9(1.4)(mSv)。结论我们的结果表明,128-MDCT的CTDIv、DLP和有效剂量明显低于64-MDCT(p<0.05)。由于两台CT扫描仪上的曝光参数mAs之间的差异不显著(p>0.05),且两台扫描仪的kV是恒定的(120 kV),这种差异是由于128-MDCT的扫描长度较短,并且使用了更高的节距系数(128-MDCT和64-MDCT的节距系数分别为0.26和0.2)。与其他已发表研究的比较证实了这一发现,并指出了减少患者剂量的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号