首页> 外文期刊>Journal of pain & palliative care pharmacotherapy >Substance Abuse Risk and Medication Monitoring in Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer Receiving Palliative Care
【24h】

Substance Abuse Risk and Medication Monitoring in Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer Receiving Palliative Care

机译:药物滥用风险和药物监测治疗姑息治疗姑息治疗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Oncology and Palliative Medicine lack guidance on routine opioid risk screening and compliance monitoring. This study explored relationships among risk screening and aberrant medication related behaviors in patients with advanced lung cancer receiving embedded palliative care. This was a single center, prospective study and data was collected from December 2018 to March 2020. At the initial palliative visit, patients provided a baseline urine drug screen (UDS) test and completed the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R) self-assessment. Clinical pharmacists provided comprehensive review and interpretation of UDS results. Among 39 patients, 12 (30.8%) scored positive for risk of aberrant medication behaviors on the SOAPP-R. Only 34 of 39 patients provided a baseline UDS test and were included in further analysis. Prior to pharmacist review, 11/11 (100%) baseline UDS results in the positive-risk group and 13/23 (56.5%) in the negative-risk group appeared unexpected (p = 0.01). After pharmacist review, aberrant baseline UDS results were confirmed for 5/11 (45.5%) positive-risk and 4/23 (17.4%) negative-risk patients (p = 0.11). Overall, the SOAPP-R alone may be inadequate in this population and clinical pharmacists play an important role in comprehensive UDS result interpretation. Future studies are needed to validate this risk-screening tool in palliative cancer populations.
机译:肿瘤学和姑息医学缺乏常规阿片类药物风险筛查和依从性监测的指导。本研究探讨了接受嵌入式姑息治疗的晚期肺癌患者的风险筛查和异常药物相关行为之间的关系。这是一项单中心前瞻性研究,数据收集时间为2018年12月至2020年3月。在最初的姑息治疗访视中,患者提供了基线尿液药物筛查(UDS)测试,并完成了疼痛患者的筛查和阿片类药物评估-修订(SOAPP-R)自我评估。临床药剂师对UDS结果进行了全面审查和解释。在39名患者中,12名(30.8%)在SOAPP-R上对异常用药行为的风险评分为阳性。39名患者中只有34名患者提供了基线UDS测试,并被纳入进一步的分析。在药剂师审查之前,阳性风险组的11/11(100%)基线UDS结果和阴性风险组的13/23(56.5%)基线UDS结果似乎出乎意料(p=0.01)。在药剂师审查后,5/11(45.5%)阳性风险患者和4/23(17.4%)阴性风险患者(p=0.11)的异常基线UDS结果得到确认。总的来说,SOAPP-R在这一人群中可能是不够的,临床药剂师在UDS结果的综合解释中发挥着重要作用。未来的研究需要在姑息性癌症人群中验证这种风险筛查工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号