首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Mathematical Psychology >On the validity of perceived social structure
【24h】

On the validity of perceived social structure

机译:论知识社会结构的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The validity of survey-based reports of social relationships is a critical assumption for much social network research. Research on informant accuracy has shown that observational data and recalled behavior by informants are imperfectly correlated, which calls into question whether complex relations like friendship and advice-seeking can be accurately measured from individual reports. A class of network inference models, the Bayesian Network Accuracy Models, growing out of the pioneering work of Batchelder and Romney on inference from informant reports, provides a principled basis for inferring network structure given such error-prone data. Using these models, we can gain insight into the accuracy of informants' self and proxy reports of social ties, and more broadly, the reliability and validity of respondents' reports of informal social relations. While existing data does not provide a criterion validity check for inferring most relationships, other notions of validity and/or reliability can still be applied. For instance, if friendship reports are generated from a common underlying network that is perceivable (albeit imperfectly) by all actors, then random subsets of actors should produce estimates that should agree (i.e., split-half reliability). Using informant reports on friendship and advice-seeking networks from four different organizations, we show substantially higher levels of split-half reliability than can be explained by chance, suggesting that models are indeed estimating a common underlying relation. We also show that informants' errors appear to be structured in ways that are consistent with cognitive models of social perception, with greater accuracy on average for large-scale network features rather than fine details, for own versus others' ties, and for core-periphery structures versus bipartitions. Evidence from construct validity checks further suggests the that common networks underlying informants' reports have properties that would be expect
机译:基于调查的社会关系报告的有效性是许多社会网络研究的关键假设。对线人准确性的研究表明,观察数据和线人回忆行为之间不完全相关,这就引发了一个问题,即友谊和寻求建议等复杂关系能否从个人报告中准确衡量。Batchelder和Romney在从线人报告推断方面的开创性工作中发展出了一类网络推理模型,即贝叶斯网络精度模型,为在此类易出错数据的情况下推断网络结构提供了原则基础。利用这些模型,我们可以深入了解线人关于社会关系的自我报告和代理报告的准确性,以及更广泛地了解受访者关于非正式社会关系报告的可靠性和有效性。虽然现有数据不能为推断大多数关系提供标准有效性检查,但有效性和/或可靠性的其他概念仍然可以应用。例如,如果友谊报告是从一个所有参与者都能感知(尽管不完全)的公共基础网络生成的,那么参与者的随机子集应该生成应该一致的估计值(即,一半的可靠性)。通过使用四个不同组织的友谊和咨询网络的线人报告,我们显示出比偶然解释的更高的分半可靠性水平,这表明模型确实在估计一种共同的潜在关系。我们还表明,告密者的错误结构似乎与社会认知的认知模型一致,对于大规模网络特征,而不是细节,对于自己与他人的关系,以及对于核心-外围结构与二分体,其平均准确性更高。结构有效性检查的证据进一步表明,作为线人报告基础的公共网络具有预期的特性

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号