...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of human nutrition and dietetics >Dietitians' practice in giving carbohydrate advice in the management of type 2 diabetes: a mixed methods study
【24h】

Dietitians' practice in giving carbohydrate advice in the management of type 2 diabetes: a mixed methods study

机译:营养师在2型糖尿病管理中给予碳水化合物建议的实践:混合方法研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background Carbohydrate is accepted as the principal nutrient affecting blood glucose in diabetes; however, current guidelines are unable to specify the optimal quantity of carbohydrate for glycaemic control. No studies exist that describe current practice amongst healthcare professionals giving carbohydrate advice in type 2 diabetes. The present study aims to improve understanding of the degree of variation in the current practice of UK registered dietitians ( RD s) by describing how RD s advise patients. Methods UK RD s were contacted through national networks and asked to complete an online survey, which was analysed using stata , version 12 (StataCorp, College Station, TX , USA ). Three consultations between dietitians and patients with type 2 diabetes were observed, followed by semi‐structured interviews with the dietitians. Results In total, 320 complete survey responses were received. Dietitians' advice varied according to expertise, training and confidence, and the complexity of the patient's blood glucose treatment. Some 48% ( n = 154) of respondents advised patients to restrict carbohydrate intake either occasionally or frequently, with 35.6% ( n = 114) considering 30–39% of total energy from carbohydrate to be a realistic expectation. The overall theme from the interviews was ‘Conflicting Priorities’, with three sub‐themes: (i) how treatment decisions are made; (ii) the difference between empowerment and advice; and (iii) contradictory advice. A disparity existed between what was observed and interview data on how dietitians rationalise the type of carbohydrate advice provided. Conclusions Dietitians' advice varies for a number of reasons. Consensus exists in some areas (e.g. carbohydrate awareness advice); however, clear definitions of such terms are lacking. Clarification of interventions may improve the consistency of approach and improve patient outcomes.
机译:摘要背景碳水化合物被认为是影响糖尿病患者血糖的主要营养素;然而,目前的指南无法指定血糖控制的最佳碳水化合物量。目前还没有研究描述医护人员在2型糖尿病患者中提供碳水化合物建议的现状。本研究旨在通过描述英国注册营养师(RD s)如何为患者提供建议,提高对其当前实践中差异程度的理解。方法通过国家网络联系英国研发人员,要求他们完成一项在线调查,并使用stata第12版(美国德克萨斯州大学站StataCorp)进行分析。观察了营养师和2型糖尿病患者之间的三次咨询,然后对营养师进行了半结构化访谈。结果共收到320份完整的调查回复。营养师的建议因专业知识、培训和信心以及患者血糖治疗的复杂性而异。约48%(n=154)的受访者建议患者偶尔或经常限制碳水化合物摄入,35.6%(n=114)的受访者认为碳水化合物总能量的30-39%是一个现实的预期。采访的总体主题是“冲突的优先事项”,包括三个子主题:(i)如何做出治疗决定;(ii)赋权和咨询之间的区别;(iii)相互矛盾的建议。在营养师如何合理化提供的碳水化合物建议类型方面,观察到的结果与采访数据之间存在差异。结论营养学家的建议因多种原因而有所不同。在某些领域存在共识(例如碳水化合物意识建议);然而,这些术语缺乏明确的定义。明确干预措施可以提高方法的一致性,改善患者的预后。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号