首页> 外文期刊>Journal of infection prevention >The Where is Norovirus Control Lost (WINCL) Study: an enhanced surveillance project to identify norovirus index cases in care settings in the UK and Ireland
【24h】

The Where is Norovirus Control Lost (WINCL) Study: an enhanced surveillance project to identify norovirus index cases in care settings in the UK and Ireland

机译:诺罗维病毒控制丢失(WinCL)研究:一个增强的监视项目,用于识别英国和爱尔兰护理环境中的诺罗维病毒指数案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Norovirus outbreaks have a significant impact on all care settings; little is known about the index cases from whom these outbreaks initiate. > Aim: To identify and categorise norovirus outbreak index cases in care settings. > Methods: A mixed-methods, multi-centre, prospective, enhanced surveillance study identified and categorised index cases in acute and non-acute care settings. > Results: From 54 participating centres, 537 outbreaks were reported (November 2013 to April 2014): 383 (71.3%) in acute care facilities (ACF); 115 (21.4%) in residential or care homes (RCH) and 39 (7.3%) in other care settings (OCS). Index cases were identified in 424 (79%) outbreaks. Of the 245 index cases who were asymptomatic on admission and not transferred within/into the care setting, 123 (50%) had been an inpatient/resident for 4 days. Four themes emerged: missing the diagnosis, care service under pressure, delay in outbreak control measures and patient/resident location and proximity. > Conclusion: The true index case is commonly not identified as the cause of a norovirus outbreak with at least 50% of index cases being misclassified. Unrecognised norovirus cross-transmission occurs frequently suggesting that either Standard Infection Control Precautions (SICPs) are being insufficiently well applied, and or SICPs are themselves are insufficient to prevent outbreaks.]]>
机译:背景:诺如病毒暴发对所有护理环境都有重大影响;对这些暴发的指数病例知之甚少。>目的:识别护理环境中的诺如病毒暴发指数病例并对其进行分类。>方法:一项混合方法、多中心、前瞻性、强化监测研究d急性和非急性护理环境中的指数病例>结果:从54个参与中心报告了537起疫情(2013年11月至2014年4月):383起(71.3%)发生在急性护理机构(ACF);115人(21.4%)在安老院或养老院,39人(7.3%)在其他护理机构。在424起(79%)疫情中发现了指数病例。在245例入院时无症状且未转入护理机构的指数病例中,123例(50%)已住院/住院4天。出现了四个主题:错过诊断、压力下的护理服务、疫情控制措施的延迟以及患者/居民的位置和距离>结论:真正的指数病例通常不会被确定为诺如病毒暴发的原因,至少50%的指数病例被错误分类。未被识别的诺如病毒交叉传播经常发生,这表明标准感染控制预防措施(SICP)没有得到充分应用,或者SICP本身不足以防止疫情暴发。]]>

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号