...
首页> 外文期刊>Dementia >Do interventions that include education on dementia progression improve knowledge, mental health and burden of family carers? A systematic review
【24h】

Do interventions that include education on dementia progression improve knowledge, mental health and burden of family carers? A systematic review

机译:是否包括关于痴呆教育进展的干预措施,提高了知识,心理健康和家庭护理人员的负担? 系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background and aim The European Association of Palliative Care recommends that family carers need education on the progression of dementia. This systematic review aimed to explore whether interventions incorporating education regarding the progressive nature of dementia increased carers’ understanding of dementia and improved mental health and burden. Method MEDLINE, PsycINFO and CINAHL were searched to April 2018. Randomised controlled trials with samples of family carers of someone with dementia were eligible. Included interventions involved a component aimed to increase the carer’s understanding of the progression of dementia. Outcomes of interest included: knowledge of dementia, depression, burden and pre-death grief. Results Searches identified 3221 unique citations of which 11 studies were eligible for review. Interventions ranged from 4 to 16 sessions of which 1 to 3 sessions focused on the progression of dementia. Knowledge : Two studies evaluated carers’ knowledge of dementia. One found no difference between the trial arms immediately after the intervention or three months later. The second found a significant intervention effect at the end of the intervention but not at three-month follow-up. Depression: Seven studies evaluated intervention effects on depression. Meta-analysis of three trials showed significant differences in mean follow-up scores favouring intervention over control. The remaining four studies did not show differences in depression between intervention and control groups. Burden : Nine studies evaluated burden and were examined in two meta-analyses (mean scores at follow-up and mean change scores from baseline to follow-up), neither of which found a benefit for intervention over control. Using the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation system, we judged the quality of evidence to be very low for depression and low for burden, knowledge and pre-death grief, reducing our confidence in any of the effect estimates. Conclusion The evidence was not sufficient to support or refute the effectiveness of education on progression of dementia on carers’ knowledge and mental health.
机译:背景与目的欧洲姑息治疗协会建议家庭护理人员需要了解痴呆症的进展情况。本系统综述旨在探讨纳入痴呆症进展性教育的干预措施是否增加了照料者对痴呆症的理解,并改善了心理健康和负担。方法检索MEDLINE、PsycINFO和CINAHL,截至2018年4月。对痴呆症患者的家庭护理者样本进行随机对照试验符合条件。包括的干预措施包括一个旨在提高护理者对痴呆症进展的理解的部分。感兴趣的结果包括:痴呆症、抑郁症、负担和临死前悲伤的知识。结果检索确定了3221个独特的引文,其中11项研究符合审查条件。干预范围为4至16个疗程,其中1至3个疗程侧重于痴呆症的进展。知识:两项研究评估了护理人员对痴呆症的知识。其中一人在干预后立即或三个月后发现试验武器之间没有差异。第二组在干预结束时发现了显著的干预效果,但在三个月的随访中没有发现。抑郁症:七项研究评估了对抑郁症的干预效果。三项试验的荟萃分析显示,平均随访分数有显著差异,倾向于干预而非对照。剩下的四项研究没有显示干预组和对照组之间抑郁症的差异。负担:九项研究评估了负担,并在两项荟萃分析(随访时的平均得分和从基线到随访的平均变化得分)中进行了检查,这两项研究均未发现干预优于控制。使用建议分级评估、开发和评估系统,我们判断抑郁症的证据质量很低,而负担、知识和临终悲痛的证据质量很低,这降低了我们对任何影响评估的信心。结论证据不足以支持或反驳痴呆进展教育对照料者知识和心理健康的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号