首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management >Cost Assessment: Electricity Generating Sources Against Energy Efficiency Measures
【24h】

Cost Assessment: Electricity Generating Sources Against Energy Efficiency Measures

机译:成本评估:电力产生能效措施的来源

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Over the last decade, South Africa has been experiencing a severe electricity supply crisis. Consequently, the stability of the national power grid has been operating under strain. The reason of this crisis was due to insufficient generation capacity as well as an increased demand for electricity. To counteract this situation, the state-owned electricity utility decided to increase its power capacity by building new power plants, and implementing energy efficiency measures to save energy, all of these came at a cost. To date, cost assessment of building new power plants and upgrading the capacity of existing plants has been the focus of various studies over the past decade. Unfortunately, this latter is biased and is not comprehensive because it only considers the costs related to the construction of power plants. Hence, snubbing the costs associated with the implementation of energy efficiency measures is becoming critical to business decision. In light of this, the present study designed a novel cost analysis that includes those blind spots. It is, therefore, believed that the novel model will offer decision makers a more accurate picture of the trade-offs involved in decisions affecting various investments in the electricity sector. To achieve this goal, the novel cost model was tested through various analyses including costs of building power generating plants (coal, gas, nuclear, wind, concentrated solar power, and solar photovoltaic) against costs of implementing energy efficiency measures (residential mass rollouts, standard offer program, standard product program, performance contracting program, and ESCO model mass rollouts), and costs of producing electricity versus costs of saving energy. The results were tested through sensitive analyses, to discount rate, to load factor, and to lifespan. Afterwards, it was demonstrated clearly that energy efficiency measures are least cost option to electricity sector, and they can help to counteract the current electricity supply crisis, delaying the need of building new power plants, and assisting the utility to save Billions of Rand (South African currency) from using large amount of coal, fuel, water, and doing much maintenance to the plants. As far as the author is aware, this study is the first example in the African continent.
机译:在过去十年中,南非经历了严重的电力供应危机。因此,国家电网的稳定性一直处于紧张状态。这场危机的原因是发电能力不足以及电力需求增加。为了应对这种情况,国有电力公司决定通过建设新的发电厂和实施节能措施来提高其发电能力,所有这些都是以成本为代价的。迄今为止,建设新电厂和升级现有电厂的成本评估一直是过去十年各种研究的重点。不幸的是,后者有失偏颇,不全面,因为它只考虑与发电厂建设有关的成本。因此,降低与实施能效措施相关的成本对商业决策变得至关重要。有鉴于此,本研究设计了一种新的成本分析,包括这些盲点。因此,人们相信,新模型将为决策者提供一个更准确的画面,说明影响电力行业各种投资的决策所涉及的权衡。为了实现这一目标,通过各种分析对新的成本模型进行了测试,包括建设发电厂(煤炭、天然气、核能、风能、集中太阳能和太阳能光伏)的成本与实施能效措施(住宅大规模推广、标准报价计划、标准产品计划、履约承包计划和ESCO模型大规模推广)的成本,以及发电成本和节能成本。通过敏感性分析、贴现率、荷载系数和寿命对结果进行了检验。之后,人们清楚地表明,能效措施是电力部门成本最低的选择,它们可以帮助应对当前的电力供应危机,推迟建设新电厂的需要,并帮助公用事业公司节省数十亿兰特(南非货币),避免大量使用煤炭、燃料、水,对工厂进行大量维护。据作者所知,这项研究是非洲大陆的第一个例子。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号