【24h】

Therapist Alliance-Building Behaviors, Alliance, and Outcomes in Cognitive Behavioral Treatment for Youth Anxiety Disorders

机译:治疗师联盟建设行为,联盟和结局在认知行为治疗中为青年焦虑症

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective: The alliance influences outcomes in CBT for youth anxiety disorders. Thus, knowledge about how therapists can enhance the alliance is needed. Method: Seventy-three youth with anxiety diagnoses (M age = 11.5 years, SD = 2.2; range 8 to 15 years; 47.9% boys; 90.4% white-European) participated in 10-session cognitive behavioral therapy in community clinics. Therapist alliance-building behaviors in session 2 was reliably coded with the observer-rated Adolescent Alliance-Building Behavior Scale (Revised) (AABS(R)). Alliance was measured as youth- and therapist-rated alliance, and youth-therapist alliance discrepancy in session 3. Outcomes were diagnostic recovery and anxiety symptom reduction at post-treatment and one-year follow-up, and treatment dropout. We examined the direct effects of alliance-building on alliance, alliance on outcomes, and alliance-building on outcomes in multilevel mediation models, and between- versus within-therapist variance across these effects. Results: The alliance-building behaviors collaborate, present treatment model, and explore motivation positively predicted alliance, whereas actively structuring the session (i.e., dominating) negatively predicted alliance. The alliance-building behaviors attend to experience, collaborate, explore motivation, praise, and support positively predicted outcomes. The alliance-building behaviors present treatment model, express positive expectations, explore cognitions, and support negatively predicted outcomes. The effect of collaborate on symptom reduction was mediated by youth-therapist alliance discrepancy. There was almost zero between-therapist variance in alliance-building, and considerable within-therapist variance. Conclusion: Therapist alliance-building behaviors were directly (positively and negatively) associated with alliance and/or outcomes, with only one effect mediated by alliance. Alliance-building behaviors varied far more within therapists (i.e., across clients) than between therapists.
机译:目的:该联盟影响青少年焦虑症CBT的结果。因此,需要了解治疗师如何加强联盟。方法:73名被诊断为焦虑症的年轻人(M年龄=11.5岁,SD=2.2;范围8-15岁;47.9%的男孩;90.4%的欧洲白人)在社区诊所参加了10个疗程的认知行为治疗。治疗师在第二节课中的联盟建立行为采用观察者评定的青少年联盟建立行为量表(修订版)(AABS(R))进行可靠编码。在第3课时,联盟被测量为青年和治疗师评定的联盟,以及青年治疗师联盟差异。结果是在治疗后和一年的随访中诊断性康复和焦虑症状减轻,以及治疗退出。我们在多层次调解模型中考察了联盟构建对联盟、联盟对结果、联盟构建对结果的直接影响,以及治疗师之间和治疗师内部在这些影响中的差异。结果:联盟构建行为合作、呈现治疗模式和探索动机对联盟具有正向预测作用,而积极构建会话(即主导)对联盟具有负向预测作用。联盟构建行为涉及体验、合作、探索动机、赞扬和支持积极预测的结果。联盟构建行为呈现治疗模式,表达积极期望,探索认知,并支持消极预测结果。合作对症状缓解的影响是由青年治疗师联盟差异介导的。在联盟建设中,治疗师之间的差异几乎为零,而治疗师内部的差异相当大。结论:治疗师建立联盟的行为与联盟和/或结果直接(正面和负面)相关,只有一种影响是由联盟介导的。与治疗师之间相比,治疗师内部(即跨客户)的联盟建立行为差异要大得多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号