...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of chemical theory and computation: JCTC >Polishing the Gold Standard: The Role of Orbital Choice in CCSD(T) Vibrational Frequency Prediction
【24h】

Polishing the Gold Standard: The Role of Orbital Choice in CCSD(T) Vibrational Frequency Prediction

机译:抛光黄金标准:轨道选择在CCSD(T)振动频率预测中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While CCSD(T) with spin-restricted Hartree–Fock (RHF) orbitals has long been lauded for its ability to accurately describe closed-shell interactions, the performance of CCSD(T) on open-shell species is much more erratic, especially when using a spin-unrestricted HF (UHF) reference. Previous studies have shown improved treatment of open-shell systems when a non-HF set of molecular orbitals, like Brueckner or Kohn–Sham density functional theory (DFT) orbitals, is used as a reference. Inspired by the success of regularized orbital-optimized second-order M?ller–Plesset perturbation theory (κ-OOMP2) orbitals as reference orbitals for MP3, we investigate the use of κ-OOMP2 orbitals and various DFT orbitals as reference orbitals for CCSD(T) calculations of the corrected ground-state harmonic vibrational frequencies of a set of 36 closed-shell (29 neutrals, 6 cations, 1 anion) and 59 open-shell diatomic species (38 neutrals, 15 cations, 6 anions). The aug-cc-pwCVTZ basis set is used for all calculations. The use of κ-OOMP2 orbitals in this context alleviates difficult cases observed for both UHF orbitals and OOMP2 orbitals. Removing two multireference systems and 12 systems with ambiguous experimental data leaves a pruned data set. Overall performance on the pruned data set highlights CCSD(T) with a B97 orbital reference (CCSD(T):B97), CCSD(T) with a κ-OOMP2 orbital reference (CCSD(T):κ-OOMP2), and CCSD(T) with a B97M-rV orbital reference (CCSD(T):B97M-rV) with RMSDs of 8.48 cm~(–1), and 8.50 cm~(–1), and 8.75 cm~(–1) respectively, outperforming CCSD(T):UHF by nearly a factor of 5. Moreover, the performance on the closed- and open-shell subsets shows these methods are able to treat open-shell and closed-shell systems with comparable accuracy and robustness. CCSD(T) with RHF orbitals is seen to improve upon UHF for the closed-shell species, while spatial symmetry breaking in a number of restricted open-shell HF (ROHF) references leads CCSD(T) with ROHF reference orbitals to exhibit the poorest statistical performance of all methods surveyed for open-shell species. The use of κ-OOMP2 orbitals has also proven useful in diagnosing multireference character that can hinder the reliability of CCSD(T).
机译:尽管具有自旋受限Hartree–Fock(RHF)轨道的CCSD(T)长期以来因其准确描述闭合壳层相互作用的能力而受到赞扬,但CCSD(T)在开放壳层物种上的性能更不稳定,尤其是在使用自旋不受限HF(UHF)参考时。以前的研究表明,当使用一组非HF的分子轨道,如Brueckner或Kohn–Sham密度泛函理论(DFT)轨道作为参考时,对开壳系统的处理有所改进。受正则化轨道优化二阶M的成功启发?Leller–Plesset微扰理论(κ-OOMP2)轨道作为MP3的参考轨道,我们研究了使用κ-OOMP2轨道和各种DFT轨道作为参考轨道,用于CCSD(T)计算36个封闭壳层(29个中性,6个阳离子,1个阴离子)和59个开放壳层双原子物种(38个中性,15个阳离子,6个阴离子)的基态谐波振动频率。所有计算均使用aug cc pwCVTZ基集。在这种情况下,κ-OOMP2轨道的使用减轻了观察到的UHF轨道和OOMP2轨道的困难情况。删除两个多参考系统和12个实验数据不明确的系统会留下一个修剪过的数据集。修剪后的数据集的整体性能突出显示了具有B97轨道参考(CCSD(T):B97)的CCSD(T),具有κ-OOMP2轨道参考(CCSD(T):κ-OOMP2)的CCSD(T),以及具有B97M rV轨道参考(CCSD(T):B97M rV)的CCSD(T),其RMSDs分别为8.48 cm~(-1)和8.50 cm~(-1)和8.75 cm~(-1),比CCSD(T):UHF高出近5倍。此外,在闭壳和开壳子集上的性能表明,这些方法能够以相当的精度和鲁棒性处理开壳和闭壳系统。有RHF轨道的CCSD(T)被视为改善了封闭壳层物种的UHF,而在一些受限的开放壳层HF(ROHF)参考中的空间对称性破缺导致有ROHF参考轨道的CCSD(T)在所有开放壳层物种调查方法中表现出最差的统计性能。κ-OOMP2轨道的使用也被证明有助于诊断可能阻碍CCSD(T)可靠性的多参考特征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号