首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention >Validity of the Past-day Adults' Sedentary Time Questionnaire in a Cardiac Rehabilitation Population
【24h】

Validity of the Past-day Adults' Sedentary Time Questionnaire in a Cardiac Rehabilitation Population

机译:过去一天成年人的久坐不动时间问卷在心脏康复人口中的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: Self-report measures of sedentary behavior are easier to use in a clinical setting; yet, no self-report measures of sedentary behavior appear to be validated in cardiac rehabilitation over time. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the Past-day Adults' Sedentary Time (PAST) questionnaire in a cardiac rehabilitation population over 12 mo. Methods: Seventy-two cardiac rehabilitation participants were recruited to a prospective cohort study. Participants wore an ActiGraph ActiSleep accelerometer (sedentary time <100 counts/min) for 7 consecutive days and completed the self-administered PAST questionnaire at baseline, 6 wk, and 6 and 12 mo. Total daily sedentary time from both methods were compared using Bland-Altman plots and Spearman rank-order correlations. Results: Agreement between the 2 measures of sedentary time improved over 12 mo. At 6 and 12 mo, there was a good level of agreement between measures (mean difference between accelerometer and PAST 57 and -0.7 min, respectively), although the dispersion of the differences was wide (95% limits of agreement -428 to 541 and -500 to 498 min, respectively). There were weak correlations between the PAST questionnaire and average accelerometer measured sedentary time at all time points (alpha = -0.249 to 0.188). Conclusions: Following repeated assessments, the PAST questionnaire may be useful to determine sedentary time in cardiac rehabilitation participants at a group level, with participants appearing to more accurately recall their time spent in sedentary behavior. Further research is indicated to assess the validity of sedentary behavior questionnaires in cardiac rehabilitation, with a combination of objective and self-reported measures currently recommended.
机译:目的:久坐行为的自我报告测量更容易在临床环境中使用;然而,久而久之,没有自我报告的久坐行为测量在心脏康复中得到验证。本研究的目的是评估过去一天成人久坐时间(Past)问卷在超过12个月的心脏康复人群中的有效性。方法:招募72名心脏康复参与者进行前瞻性队列研究。参与者连续7天佩戴活动记录仪(静坐时间<100计数/分钟),并在基线检查、6周、6个月和12个月时完成自我管理的既往问卷。使用Bland Altman图和Spearman秩次相关法比较两种方法的每日总静坐时间。结果:两种久坐时间测量值之间的一致性在12个月后得到改善。在6个月和12个月时,测量值之间的一致性很好(加速计与过去57分钟和-0.7分钟之间的平均差异),尽管差异的分散性很广(95%的一致性限值分别为-428到541和-500到498分钟)。过去的调查问卷与所有时间点的平均久坐时间之间的相关性较弱(α=-0.249至0.188)。结论:经过反复评估,过去的问卷可能有助于确定心脏康复参与者在群体水平上的久坐时间,参与者似乎能更准确地回忆起他们在久坐行为中花费的时间。还需要进行进一步研究,以评估久坐行为问卷在心脏康复中的有效性,目前推荐采用客观和自我报告相结合的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号