首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Archaeological Science >A citation network analysis of lithic microwear research
【24h】

A citation network analysis of lithic microwear research

机译:岩石微针研究的引文分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The introduction of lithic microwear research into the wider archaeological community by Keeley (1980) was concurrent with the development of the processual paradigm and the adoption of the scientific method. Subsequently, lithic microwear research has benefited from over 35 years of innovation, including the introduction of novel methodological and analytical procedures. The present study employs a citation network to objectively analyse the development of microwear research. Given developments in technology, as well as the institutional isolation of early microwear research, the present analysis considers the citation network that stems from Keeley's seminal 1980 volume. The 363 papers identified as having cited Keeley (1980) in the subsequent 35 years were treated as individual nodes within the citation network. Before analysis, nodes were assigned attributes, including the type of research published and whether they were supportive of three key aspects of Keeley's experimental program: the ability to determine the function of the tool and to ascertain the type of worked material from microwear, as well as the use of high-powered microscopy techniques. Emergent properties of the papers, including closeness centrality, indegree and betweenness centrality, are used to test for significant differences between paper attributes. Similarly a clustering algorithm is used to objectively define distinct clusters of important papers within the discipline. Results indicate that a small number of nodes in the network maintain statistically significant influence on the form of the citation network. These important nodes and the distinct 'schools of thought' identified are discussed in the context of Keeley's initial contribution to the sub-field. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:Keeley(1980)将石器时代的微磨损研究引入更广泛的考古学界,与过程范式的发展和科学方法的采用同步进行。随后,岩屑微磨损研究得益于超过35年的创新,包括新方法和分析方法的引入。本研究采用引文网络客观分析了微磨损研究的发展。鉴于技术的发展,以及早期微磨损研究的机构隔离,本分析考虑了源自Keeley 1980年开创性著作的引用网络。在随后的35年中,363篇被确定为引用了Keeley(1980)的论文被视为引用网络中的单个节点。在分析之前,节点被分配了属性,包括发表的研究类型,以及它们是否支持Keeley实验计划的三个关键方面:确定工具功能的能力,从微磨损中确定加工材料的类型,以及高性能显微镜技术的使用。论文的涌现属性,包括贴近度中心性、独立度和中间度中心性,被用来测试论文属性之间的显著差异。类似地,聚类算法用于客观地定义学科内重要论文的不同聚类。结果表明,网络中的少量节点对引文网络的形式具有显著的统计影响。这些重要节点和所确定的不同“思想流派”将在Keeley对该子领域的最初贡献中讨论。(C) 2018爱思唯尔有限公司版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号