...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Archaeological Science >A citation network analysis of lithic microwear research
【24h】

A citation network analysis of lithic microwear research

机译:岩石微针研究的引文分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The introduction of lithic microwear research into the wider archaeological community by Keeley (1980) was concurrent with the development of the processual paradigm and the adoption of the scientific method. Subsequently, lithic microwear research has benefited from over 35 years of innovation, including the introduction of novel methodological and analytical procedures. The present study employs a citation network to objectively analyse the development of microwear research. Given developments in technology, as well as the institutional isolation of early microwear research, the present analysis considers the citation network that stems from Keeley's seminal 1980 volume. The 363 papers identified as having cited Keeley (1980) in the subsequent 35 years were treated as individual nodes within the citation network. Before analysis, nodes were assigned attributes, including the type of research published and whether they were supportive of three key aspects of Keeley's experimental program: the ability to determine the function of the tool and to ascertain the type of worked material from microwear, as well as the use of high-powered microscopy techniques. Emergent properties of the papers, including closeness centrality, indegree and betweenness centrality, are used to test for significant differences between paper attributes. Similarly a clustering algorithm is used to objectively define distinct clusters of important papers within the discipline. Results indicate that a small number of nodes in the network maintain statistically significant influence on the form of the citation network. These important nodes and the distinct 'schools of thought' identified are discussed in the context of Keeley's initial contribution to the sub-field. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:Keeley(1980)将Lithic MicroWear研究引入更广泛的考古社区(1980)并发在发展范式和采用科学方法的情况下并发。随后,岩石微陶法研究受益于35多年的创新,包括引入新的方法和分析程序。本研究采用引文网络,客观地分析微型测量研究的发展。鉴于技术的发展,以及早期微型测量研究的制度隔离,目前的分析考虑了源于Keeley的精英1980年的引用网络。在随后的35岁中被引用的Keeley(1980)确定的363篇论文被视为引文网络内的个别节点。在分析之前,节点被分配了属性,包括研究类型,以及它们是否支持基奈的实验计划的三个关键方面:确定工具功能并确定来自微米的工作的类型的功能作为使用高功率显微镜技术。纸张的紧急性质,包括亲密中心,印度,中心地位,用于测试纸张属性之间的显着差异。类似地,群集算法用于客观地定义学科内的重要纸张的不同集群。结果表明,网络中的少量节点对引文网络的形式保持统计上显着的影响。在Keeley对子领域的初步贡献的背景下讨论了这些重要节点和截然的“思想学校”。 (c)2018年elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号