首页> 外文期刊>Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore >Assessing professionalism in early medical education: experience with peer evaluation and self-evaluation in the gross anatomy course.
【24h】

Assessing professionalism in early medical education: experience with peer evaluation and self-evaluation in the gross anatomy course.

机译:在早期医学教育中评估专业水平:在总体解剖学课程中具有同伴评估和自我评估的经验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

INTRODUCTION: As today's healthcare model moves toward more streamlined and corporate industrialism, it is our responsibility, as doctors, to ensure the integrity of medicine's foundation in professionalism. The erosion of professional values not only creates a climate of animosity, but reverberates negatively to impact the development of students, who model their behaviour after those they most respect. This hazard has spurred an evaluation of medical school curricula, with a new emphasis on professionalism in the philosophy of medical education. Courses such as Gross Anatomy that, in the past, offered "pure content," are now being used to teach and evaluate professionalism. The goal of this study was to determine if peer evaluation and self-evaluation used in conjunction and implemented early in the medical curriculum, can serve as useful tools to assess and provide feedback regarding professional behaviour in first-year medical students. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1999 to 2003, students at Mayo Clinic College of Medicine evaluated themselves and their peers during the Gross and Developmental Anatomy Course. Numerical evaluations and written comments were statistically analysed within established categories of professionalism and correlated with academic performance, gender, and peer rating and self-rating. RESULTS: The majority of written comments pertained to inter-professional respect, responsibility, and excellence. Students who gave higher peer evaluation and self-evaluation scores provided more positive comments, and students performing well in the course provided more positive comments about their peers and themselves than did those struggling academically. Students consistently rated their peers higher than themselves, and male students rated themselves higher than did female students. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing peer evaluation and self-evaluation early in the medical curriculum is a valuable exercise in teaching first-year medical students assessment skills when evaluating their behaviour, aswell as the behaviour of their colleagues.
机译:简介:随着当今的医疗模式朝着更简化和企业工业化的方向发展,作为医生,我们有责任确保医学专业基础的完整性。专业价值观的侵蚀不仅营造了敌意气氛,而且还给学生的发展带来负面影响,这些学生以他们最尊重的人为榜样。这种危害促使人们对医学院课程进行评估,并在医学教育理念上重新强调了专业精神。过去曾提供“纯内容”的课程,例如大解剖学,现在正用于教授和评估专业水平。这项研究的目的是确定同伴评估和自我评估是否可以结合使用并在医学课程的早期实施,是否可以作为评估和提供有关医学专业一年级学生行为的有用工具。材料与方法:从1999年至2003年,梅奥诊所医学院的学生在大体与发育解剖学课程中对自己和同伴进行了评估。在既定的专业水平内,对数字评估和书面评论进行了统计分析,并与学业成绩,性别,同伴评价和自我评价相关。结果:大多数书面评论都涉及专业间的尊重,责任和卓越。与同伴相比,在学业上表现不佳的学生对同伴评价和自我评价得分更高,对同伴和自己的评价也更高。学生对同伴的评价始终高于自己,男生对自己的评价高于女生。结论:在医学课程中尽早实施同伴评估和自我评估,对于教医学一年级学生评估其行为以及同事的行为时的评估技能是一项有价值的练习。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号