...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology: the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc >The impact of the distance between the atrial electrode and the atrial wall on atrial undersensing in patients with VDD pacemakers: long-term follow-up.
【24h】

The impact of the distance between the atrial electrode and the atrial wall on atrial undersensing in patients with VDD pacemakers: long-term follow-up.

机译:VDD起搏器患者心房电极与心房壁之间的距离对心房感觉不足的影响:长期随访。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIM: Atrial undersensing (AUS) in single-lead VDD pacemakers may be due to diminished P-wave amplitude secondary to local inflammation beneath the electrodes closer to atrial wall. The aim of this study was to assess the potential effect of distance between atrial electrode and atrial wall on immediate and long-term atrial sensing stability in VDD systems. METHODS: A total of 275 patients with normal sinus node function who received VDD pacemakers were enrolled into the study and were followed up for a median duration of 33 months. During each control visit, a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was obtained and standard pacemaker function assessment was performed including testing for pacing threshold and atrioventricular synchrony. The distance between atrial electrode and atrial wall was measured from chest X-ray. RESULTS: Of the 275 patients, AUS was detected in 59 patients. Univariate predictors of AUS were use of closely spaced bipolar ring atrial electrode (CSBR) (P = 0.01), wider atrial ring-spacing (P = 0.03), and atrial sensitivity programmed to a higher level (P = 0.001). Use of CSBR (P = 0.04) and atrial sensitivity > or =0.3 mV (P = 0.02) were observed to be the independent predictors for AUS. When the distance between atrial electrode and atrial wall was <7 mm, AUS was less with diagonally arranged bipolar ring electrodes (DABR) than it was with CSBRs (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The distance between atrial electrode and atrial wall does not appear to affect AUS incidence in VDD pacemakers. For VDD electrodes closer to atrial wall, AUS was significantly less likely in DABR-type electrodes.
机译:目的:单引线VDD起搏器中的心房感应不足(AUS)可能是由于继靠近心房壁的电极下方的局部炎症继发的P波振幅降低所致。这项研究的目的是评估VDD系统中心房电极和心房壁之间距离对即时和长期心房感测稳定性的潜在影响。方法:总共275名接受VDD起搏器的窦房结功能正常的患者被纳入研究,并进行了33个月的中位随访。在每次对照访视期间,均获得标准的12导联心电图(ECG),并进行标准的起搏器功能评估,包括起搏阈值和房室同步性测试。从胸部X射线测量心房电极与心房壁之间的距离。结果:在275例患者中,有59例患者检测到AUS。 AUS的单因素预测因素是使用紧密间隔的双极环心房电极(CSBR)(P = 0.01),较宽的心房环间隔(P = 0.03)和将心房敏感性编程为较高水平(P = 0.001)。使用CSBR(P = 0.04)和心房敏感性>或= 0.3 mV(P = 0.02)被认为是AUS的独立预测因子。当心房电极与心房壁之间的距离小于7 mm时,对角排列的双极环形电极(DABR)的AUS小于CSBR(P = 0.02)。结论:心房电极和房壁之间的距离似乎并不影响VDD起搏器的AUS发生率。对于靠近心房壁的VDD电极,DABR型电极中AUS的可能性明显降低。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号