...
首页> 外文期刊>Health policy and planning >Investigating the process of evidence-informed health policymaking in Bangladesh: a systematic review
【24h】

Investigating the process of evidence-informed health policymaking in Bangladesh: a systematic review

机译:调查孟加拉国的证据明智的卫生政策制定的过程:系统审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Over the last four decades, Bangladesh has made considerable improvements in population health, this is in part due to the use of evidence to inform policymaking. This systematic review aims to better understand critical factors that have facilitated the diffusion of scientific evidence into multiple phases of health policymaking in Bangladesh. To do this an existing policy framework designed by Shiffman and Smith in 2007, was used to extract and synthesize data from selected policy analyses. This framework was used to ensure the content, context and actors involved with evidence-informed policymaking were considered in each case where research had helped shape a health policy. The 'PRISMA Checklist' was employed to design pre-specified eligibility criteria for the selection of information sources, search strategy, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and process of data extraction and synthesis. Through our systematic search conducted from February to May 2017, we initially identified 1859 articles; after removal of duplicates, followed by the screening of titles, abstracts and full-texts, 24 articles were included in the analysis. Health policy issues included the following topics: maternal and child health, tobacco control, reproductive health, infectious disease control and the impact and sustainability of knowledge translation platforms. Findings suggested that research evidence that could be used to meet key targets associated with the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) were more likely to be considered as a political (and therefore policy) priority. Furthermore, avenues of engagement between research organizations and the government as well as collective action from civil-society organizations were important for the diffusion of evidence into policies. Through this article, it is apparent that the interface between evidence and policy formulation occurs when evidence is, disseminated by a cohesive policynet-work with strong leadership and framed to deliver solutions for problems on both the domestic and global development agenda.
机译:在过去40年中,孟加拉国在人口健康方面取得了相当大的改善,这在一定程度上是由于利用证据为决策提供信息。这项系统性审查旨在更好地了解促进科学证据在孟加拉国卫生政策制定的多个阶段传播的关键因素。为此,希夫曼和史密斯在2007年设计了一个现有的政策框架,用于从选定的政策分析中提取和综合数据。该框架用于确保在研究有助于制定卫生政策的每一个案例中,都考虑到与循证决策有关的内容、背景和参与者。“PRISMA检查表”用于设计预先指定的资格标准,用于选择信息源、搜索策略、纳入和排除标准,以及数据提取和合成过程。通过2017年2月至5月的系统搜索,我们初步确定了1859篇文章;在删除重复内容,然后筛选标题、摘要和全文后,24篇文章被纳入分析。卫生政策问题包括以下主题:妇幼健康、烟草控制、生殖健康、传染病控制以及知识翻译平台的影响和可持续性。调查结果表明,可以用来实现与千年发展目标有关的关键目标的研究证据更有可能被视为政治(因此也是政策)优先事项。此外,研究组织和政府之间的接触渠道以及民间社会组织的集体行动对于将证据传播到政策中非常重要。通过本文,可以明显看出,证据与政策制定之间的接口发生在证据通过一个具有强大领导能力的有凝聚力的政策网络进行传播,并为国内和全球发展议程上的问题提供解决方案时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号