...
首页> 外文期刊>Health policy and planning >Exploiting the emergent nature of mixed methods designs: insights from a mixed methods impact evaluation in Malawi
【24h】

Exploiting the emergent nature of mixed methods designs: insights from a mixed methods impact evaluation in Malawi

机译:利用混合方法设计的紧急性质:来自混合方法的见解影响马拉维的影响评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The application of mixed methods in Health Policy and Systems Research (HPSR) has expanded remarkably. Nevertheless, a recent review has highlighted how many mixed methods studies do not conceptualize the quantitative and the qualitative component as part of a single research effort, failing to make use of integrated approaches to data collection and analysis. More specifically, current mixed methods studies rarely rely on emergent designs as a specific feature of this methodological approach. In our work, we postulate that explicitly acknowledging the emergent nature of mixed methods research by building on a continuous exchange between quantitative and qualitative strains of data collection and analysis leads to a richer and more informative application in the field of HPSR. We illustrate our point by reflecting on our own experience conducting the mixed methods impact evaluation of a complex health system intervention in Malawi, the Results Based Financing for Maternal and Newborn Health Initiative. We describe how in the light of a contradiction between the initial set of quantitative and qualitative findings, we modified our design multiple times to include additional sources of quantitative and qualitative data and analytical approaches. To find an answer to the initial riddle, we made use of household survey data, routine health facility data, and multiple rounds of interviews with both healthcare workers and service users. We highlight what contextual factors made it possible for us to maintain the high level of methodological flexibility that ultimately allowed us to solve the riddle. This process of constant reiteration between quantitative and qualitative data allowed us to provide policymakers with a more credible and comprehensive picture of what dynamics the intervention had triggered and with what effects, in a way that we would have never been able to do had we kept faithful to our original mixed methods design.
机译:混合方法在卫生政策和系统研究(HPSR)中的应用显著扩大。尽管如此,最近的一项综述强调了有多少混合方法研究没有将定量和定性部分概念化为单一研究工作的一部分,未能利用综合方法进行数据收集和分析。更具体地说,目前的混合方法研究很少依赖紧急设计作为这种方法学方法的一个具体特征。在我们的工作中,我们假设,通过在数据收集和分析的定量和定性菌株之间的持续交换,明确承认混合方法研究的新兴性质,将在HPSR领域带来更丰富、更信息化的应用。我们通过反思自己对马拉维复杂的卫生系统干预进行混合方法影响评估的经验来说明我们的观点,这是基于结果的孕产妇和新生儿健康融资倡议。我们描述了如何根据最初的定量和定性结果之间的矛盾,多次修改我们的设计,以包括定量和定性数据以及分析方法的额外来源。为了找到最初谜题的答案,我们利用了家庭调查数据、常规医疗设施数据,以及对医护人员和服务使用者的多轮访谈。我们强调了什么样的背景因素使我们能够保持高水平的方法灵活性,从而最终使我们能够解开这个谜团。定量和定性数据之间不断重复的这一过程,使我们能够向决策者提供一个更可信、更全面的画面,说明干预引发了什么样的动态,产生了什么样的影响,如果我们坚持最初的混合方法设计,我们将永远无法做到这一点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号