...
首页> 外文期刊>Health policy and planning >The quality of care in outpatient primary care in public and private sectors in Malaysia
【24h】

The quality of care in outpatient primary care in public and private sectors in Malaysia

机译:马来西亚公共和私营部门门诊初级保健的护理质量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In Malaysia, first-contact, primary care is provided by parallel public and private sectors, which are completely separate in organization, financing and governance. As the country considers new approaches to financing, including using public schemes to pay for private care, it is crucial to examine the quality of clinical care in the two sectors to make informed decisions on public policy. This study intends to measure and compare the quality of clinical care between public and private primary care services in Malaysia and, to the extent possible, assess quality with the developed economies that Malaysia aspires to join. We carried out a retrospective analysis of the National Medical Care Survey 2014, a nationally representative survey of doctor-patient encounters in Malaysia. We assessed clinical quality for 27 587 patient encounters using data on 66 internationally validated quality indicators. Aggregate scores were constructed, and comparisons made between the public and private sectors. Overall, patients received the recommended care just over half the time (56.5%). The public sector performed better than the private sector, especially in the treatment of acute conditions, chronic conditions and in prescribing practices. Both sectors performed poorly in the indicators that are most resource intensive, suggesting that resource constraints limit overall quality. A comparison with 2003 data from the USA, suggests that performance in Malaysia was similar to that a decade earlier in the USA for common indicators. The public sector showed better performance in clinical care than the private sector, contrary to common perceptions in Malaysia and despite providing worse consumer quality. The overall quality of outpatient clinical care in Malaysia appears comparable to other developed countries, yet there are gaps in quality, such as in the management of hypertension, which should be tackled to improve overall health outcomes.
机译:在马来西亚,初级保健是由平行的公共和私营部门提供的,它们在组织、融资和治理方面完全独立。随着该国考虑新的融资方式,包括使用公共计划支付私人医疗费用,审查这两个部门的临床医疗质量,以便就公共政策做出明智的决定至关重要。本研究旨在衡量和比较马来西亚公立和私立初级保健服务的临床护理质量,并尽可能评估马来西亚希望加入的发达经济体的质量。我们对2014年全国医疗保健调查(National Medical Care Survey 2014)进行了回顾性分析,这是一项针对马来西亚医患关系的全国性代表性调查。我们使用66项国际认可的质量指标数据评估了27587例患者的临床质量。构建了总分,并对公共部门和私营部门进行了比较。总体而言,患者接受推荐护理的时间略多于一半(56.5%)。公共部门的表现优于私营部门,尤其是在急性病、慢性病和处方方面。这两个行业在资源最密集的指标上表现不佳,表明资源限制限制了整体质量。与美国2003年的数据相比,马来西亚的表现与十年前美国的共同指标类似。公共部门在临床护理方面表现出比私营部门更好的表现,这与马来西亚的普遍看法相反,尽管提供的消费者质量较差。马来西亚门诊临床护理的整体质量似乎与其他发达国家相当,但在质量方面存在差距,如高血压的管理,应加以解决,以改善整体健康结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号