首页> 外文期刊>Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences >Assessing RSCI Economics Journals in the Context of Creating a National Citation Index
【24h】

Assessing RSCI Economics Journals in the Context of Creating a National Citation Index

机译:在创建国家引文指数的背景下评估RSCI经济学期刊

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The creation of a national scientometric database of scientific periodicals in Russia can solve the problem of identifying leading academic journals. The first step towards its formation was the development of Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI). To make it clear whether the contradictions of its first version, released in 2015, were settled, this article analyzes the quantitative indicators, including bibliometric ones, of the 28 economics journals that were included in 2018 in the second version of Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI-2018). The data obtained are compared with the public examination results. To complete the coverage of the list of journals, quantitative and qualitative indicators of several editions not included in RSCI-2018 have been analyzed. It is demonstrated that the shortcomings of the previous version of the list were not eliminated. It is concluded that the list is incomplete; some criteria in compiling it were untransparent and neglected, and the parameters used to select the editions were insufficient. The research results, which make it possible to assess the RSCI potential for the creation of a national scientometric database of scientific periodicals, raise the question of the need to consolidate the efforts of the scientific and expert communities to establish transparent journal selection procedures. Official structures may consider the data obtained to assess the performance of scientific organizations, contributing to an increase in the level of periodicals.
机译:俄罗斯科学期刊国家科学计量数据库的建立可以解决识别主要学术期刊的问题。其形成的第一步是开发俄罗斯科学引文索引(RSCI)。为了明确2015年发布的第一版的矛盾是否得到解决,本文分析了俄罗斯科学引文索引(RSCI-2018)第二版2018年收录的28种经济学期刊的定量指标,包括文献计量指标。所得数据与公开考试结果进行了比较。为了完成期刊列表的覆盖范围,对RSCI-2018中未包含的几个版本的定量和定性指标进行了分析。事实表明,前一版本清单的缺点没有消除。结论是清单不完整;在编写过程中,一些标准没有被翻译和忽略,用于选择版本的参数也不够充分。研究结果使评估RSCI建立国家科学期刊科学计量数据库的潜力成为可能,提出了需要加强科学和专家界建立透明期刊选择程序的努力的问题。官方结构可以考虑所获得的数据来评估科学组织的表现,有助于提高期刊的水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号