首页> 外文会议>Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology >Citation Functions in Social Sciences and Humanities: Preliminary Results from a Citation Context Analysis of Taiwan's History Research Journals
【24h】

Citation Functions in Social Sciences and Humanities: Preliminary Results from a Citation Context Analysis of Taiwan's History Research Journals

机译:社会科学与人文学科的引文职能:台湾历史研究期刊的引文上下文分析初步结果

获取原文

摘要

This ongoing study employs citation context analysis to examine the citation functions in social sciences and humanities (SS&H) disciplines. The analyses focus on the uses of organic/perfunctory citations and confirmative/negational citations. In this poster, we will present the preliminary findings from the completed analysis on Chinese history research papers. Chinese history authors used a large amount of perfunctory citations. The percentage of negational citations was also high, and many papers have negated a previous research. It has seriously challenged the citation analysis assumptions that citations are of equal contribution and that citation means author endorsement of previous literatures. We will continue to complete the analyses for the other chosen SS&H disciplines, and we encourage other researchers to extend the analysis to other subject areas and in other countries or languages so as to better understand researchers' citation behavior and to better assess the applicability of citation analysis in different domains.
机译:该持续的研究采用引文上下文分析来检查社会科学和人文学科的引文功能。分析专注于有机/敷衍引力和确认/否定引用的用途。在这张海报中,我们将提出初步调查结果,从汉语历史研究论文进行了完整的分析。中国历史作者使用了大量的敷衍引力。否定引用的百分比也很高,许多论文否定了以前的研究。它严重挑战了引文分析假设,即引文具有平等贡献,引文意味着提交人以前的文献。我们将继续完成其他选择的SS&H学科的分析,我们鼓励其他研究人员将分析扩展到其他主题领域以及其他国家或语言,以便更好地了解研究人员的引用行为,并更好地评估引文的适用性不同域分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号