首页> 外文期刊>Health >Facilitating resident community in nursing homes: a slippery slope? An analysis on collectivistic and individualistic approaches
【24h】

Facilitating resident community in nursing homes: a slippery slope? An analysis on collectivistic and individualistic approaches

机译:促进养老院的居民社区:滑坡? 集体和个性化方法分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Residents in nursing homes are old and frail and are dependent on constant care, medical, or otherwise, by trained professionals. But they are also social beings, secluded in an institutional setting which is both total and foreign. In this setting, most of the residents most of the time must relate to other residents: other residents are the nursing home residents' peers, companions, and perhaps even significant others. In this article, we will discuss how resident communities in nursing homes are influenced by the approaches of nursing home staff. Two nursing homes have been included in this articleone from Canada and one from Norway. Participant observation was conducted at these two nursing homes, predominantly focusing on everyday-life activities. The cases from Norway and Canada are illustrative of two very different general approaches to residents: one collectivistic and one individualistic. These general approaches produce different contexts for the formation and content of resident communities, greatly affecting nursing home residents. The significance of these approaches to resident community is profound and also somewhat unanticipated; the approaches of staff provide residents with different opportunities and limitations and also yield unintended consequences for the social life of residents. The two different general approaches are, we suggest, cultural expressions, conditioned by more than official preferences and recommendations. The difference between the institutions is, in other words, anchored in ideas and ideologies that are not explicitly addressed.
机译:疗养院的居民年老体弱,依赖训练有素的专业人员的持续护理、医疗或其他服务。但他们也是社会人,被隔离在一个既完整又陌生的制度环境中。在这种情况下,大多数住院医生大多数时间都必须与其他住院医生建立联系:其他住院医生是养老院住院医生的同龄人、同伴,甚至可能是重要的其他人。在这篇文章中,我们将讨论养老院的居民社区是如何受到养老院工作人员方法的影响的。本文中包括了两家养老院,一家来自加拿大,一家来自挪威。参与者观察在这两家养老院进行,主要关注日常生活活动。挪威和加拿大的案例说明了对待居民的两种截然不同的一般方法:一种是集体主义,另一种是个人主义。这些通用方法为居民社区的形成和内容创造了不同的环境,极大地影响了养老院居民。这些方法对居民社区的意义是深远的,也有些出乎意料;工作人员的做法为居民提供了不同的机会和限制,也给居民的社会生活带来了意想不到的后果。我们认为,这两种不同的通用方法是文化表达,受官方偏好和建议的制约。换句话说,这两个机构之间的区别在于没有明确提及的理念和意识形态。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号