...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of oncology: official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology >Dose-escalated CHOEP for the treatment of young patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: II. Results of the randomized high-CHOEP trial of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL).
【24h】

Dose-escalated CHOEP for the treatment of young patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: II. Results of the randomized high-CHOEP trial of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL).

机译:剂量递增的CHOEP治疗年轻的侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者:II。德国高级非霍奇金淋巴瘤研究组(DSHNHL)的随机高CHOEP试验结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The addition of etoposide to combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone [etoposide to combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone (CHOEP)] improved outcome of young patients with good-prognosis aggressive lymphoma. To improve results further, the maximal dose-escalated version of CHOEP-21 tolerable without stem-cell support (high CHOEP: cyclophosphamide 1400 mg/m2, doxorubicin 65 mg/m2, vincristine 2 mg, etoposide 175 mg/m2 x3, prednisone 100 mg x5) was compared with CHOEP-21. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Intention-to-treat analysis of 389 young (18-60 years) patients with good-prognosis (age-adjusted International Prognostic Index = 0, 1) aggressive lymphoma randomized to CHOEP-21 (n = 194) or high CHOEP (n = 195). RESULTS: There was no difference in 3-year event-free (64% versus 67%; P = 0.734) or overall survival (83% versus 87%; P = 0.849). Neither low-risk nor low-intermediate risk patients benefited from high CHOEP. High CHOEP was more toxic than CHOEP-21 (grades 3 and 4 leukocytopenia 100% versus 87.2%, P < 0.001; thrombocytopenia 80.8% versus 9.6%, P < 0.001; infections 35% versus 11%, P < 0.001; therapy-associated deaths 3.1% versus 0%, P 0.03). CONCLUSION: Dose-escalated CHOEP-21 does not provide clinical benefit for young patients with good-prognosis aggressive lymphomas. Since differences between chemotherapy regimens are compressed by the addition of rituximab, the results of this trial have bearing on strategies aiming to improve outcome of good-prognosis aggressive lymphomas in the rituximab era.
机译:背景:依托泊苷联合环磷酰胺,阿霉素,长春新碱和泼尼松联合化疗[依托泊苷联合环磷酰胺,长春新碱和泼尼松联合化疗(CHOEP)]可改善年轻,预后良好的侵袭性淋巴瘤患者的预后。为了进一步改善结果,在没有干细胞支持的情况下可耐受的最大剂量递增版本CHOEP-21(高CHOEP:环磷酰胺1400 mg / m2,阿霉素65 mg / m2,长春新碱2 mg,依托泊苷175 mg / m2 x3,泼尼松100毫克x5)与CHOEP-21进行了比较。患者与方法:对389例预后良好(年龄调整后的国际预后指数= 0、1),侵袭性淋巴瘤随机分为CHOEP-21(n = 194)或高预后的青年患者进行意向治疗分析CHOEP(n = 195)。结果:3年无事件(64%对67%; P = 0.734)或总生存率(83%对87%; P = 0.849)没有差异。低危和低中危患者均未从高CHOEP中获益。高CHOEP比CHOEP-21更具毒性(3级和4级白细胞减少症100%比87.2%,P <0.001;血小板减少症80.8%对9.6%,P <0.001;感染35%对11%,P <0.001;治疗相关死亡率分别为3.1%和0%,P = 0.03)。结论:剂量递增的CHOEP-21不能为预后良好的侵袭性淋巴瘤年轻患者提供临床益处。由于化疗方案之间的差异因利妥昔单抗的加入而缩小,因此该试验的结果与旨在改善利妥昔单抗时代预后良好的侵袭性淋巴瘤的预后有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号