...
首页> 外文期刊>Transfusion medicine reviews >International Survey of Trials of Convalescent Plasma to Treat COVID-19 Infection
【24h】

International Survey of Trials of Convalescent Plasma to Treat COVID-19 Infection

机译:治疗Covid-19感染的康复血浆试验的国际调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The collection and clinical use of COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) as a therapy for COVID-19 infection is under development and early use in many centers worldwide. We conducted an international survey of centers undertaking studies of CCP to provide understanding of the common themes and differences between them. Sixty-four studies in 22 countries were identified from clinical trial registries and personal contacts of the authors. Twenty of the 64 centers (31%) from 12 of 22 countries (55%) responded to the survey. Of the 20 studies, 11 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and 9 were case series. Only 4 of the RCTs plan to recruit 400 patients or more, and only 3 RCTs were blinded. The majority of studies will study the effect of CCP on sick patients requiring hospitalization and those requiring critical care, and none is examining the role of CCP in non-infected at-risk individuals. A wide variety of primary and secondary outcomes are being used. The donor eligibility criteria among the studies are very similar, and the use of plasmapheresis for the collection of CCP is almost universal. The planned dose of CCP ranges from as little as 200 ml to well over 1 L, but is 400 to 800 ml or 4 mL/kg or greater in all the RCTs. There is considerable variability in donor antibody testing with no consistency regarding the cutoff for antibody titer for acceptance as CCP or the use of pathogen-inactivation. Our survey provides an understanding of the similarities and differences among the studies of CCP, and that by virtue of their design some studies may be more informative than others. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:COVID-19恢复血浆(CCP)作为COVID-19感染的治疗的收集和临床应用正在世界范围内的许多中心开发和早期使用。我们对从事CCP研究的中心进行了一次国际调查,以了解它们之间的共同主题和差异。来自22个国家的64项研究是从临床试验登记和作者的个人接触中确定的。来自22个国家中12个国家(55%)的64个中心中有20个(31%)对调查做出了回应。在20项研究中,11项为随机对照试验(RCT),9项为病例系列。只有4项随机对照试验计划招募400名或更多患者,只有3项随机对照试验是盲法的。大多数研究将研究CCP对需要住院治疗的病人和需要重症监护的病人的影响,没有一项研究探讨CCP在非感染高危人群中的作用。目前正在使用各种主要和次要结果。研究中的捐赠者资格标准非常相似,血浆置换术用于收集CCP几乎是普遍的。CCP的计划剂量范围为200毫升至1升以上,但在所有RCT中为400至800毫升或4毫升/千克或更大。供体抗体检测存在相当大的变异性,在作为CCP接受的抗体滴度或病原体灭活的使用方面没有一致性。我们的调查提供了对CCP研究之间的相似性和差异性的理解,并且凭借其设计,一些研究可能比其他研究更具信息量。(C) 2020爱思唯尔公司版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号