首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons >The Cost of Robot-assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty: Comparing Safety and Hospital Charges to Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty
【24h】

The Cost of Robot-assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty: Comparing Safety and Hospital Charges to Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty

机译:机器人辅助总髋关节置换术的成本:将安全性和医院收费与常规总髋关节置换术进行比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Introduction: Utilization of robotic assistance is increasing for total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, few studies have directly examined the efficacy of this technique at reducing complications. This research aims to compare the rates of perioperative complications of robotic-assisted THA (RA-THA) with conventional THA (C-THA). Methods: This study screened more than 35 million hospital discharges between 2010 to 2014 using the National Inpatient Sample. The International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) procedure codes were used to identify 292,836 patients who underwent C-THA (ICD 81.51) and 946 patients who underwent RA-THA (ICD 81.51 and ICD 17.41, 17.49). Perioperative complications were identified using ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes. Patient mortality was determined using the Uniform Bill patient disposition. The RA-THA cohort was statistically matched 1:1 to C-THA about patient age, sex, race, comorbidities, hospital type, and calendar year. Mean cost and length of stay (LOS) for each cohort were calculated and compared using the Kruskal-Wallis H test. Logistic regression was used to compare the risks of major and minor complications between the cohorts. Results: We matched 758 (80.13%) RA-THA patients with 758 patients who underwent C-THA. No patient in our sample died. When compared with the conventional group, multivariate analysis revealed that the risk of major complications was similar in RA-THA patients (odds ratio = 0.698, 95% confidence interval = 0.282 to 1.727). In addition, although the rate of minor complications was higher in the RA-THA cohort (21.6% versus 12.5%, P = 0.004), no difference was observed on multivariate analysis (odds ratio = 1.248, 95% confidence interval = 0.852 to 1.829). The average inpatient hospital cost of a RA-THA was $20,046 (SD = 6,165) compared with $18,258 (SD = 6,147) for C-THA (P < 0.001). The average LOS was for RA-THA was 2.69 days (SD = 1.25) compared with 2.82 days for C-THA (SD = 1.18, P < 0.001). Discussion: In a statistically matched cohort, the risk of perioperative complication in patients who underwent RA-THA versus C-THA patients were similar. However, RA-THA was costlier despite shorter LOS.
机译:简介:全髋关节置换术(THA)中机器人辅助的使用正在增加。然而,很少有研究直接检验这种技术在减少并发症方面的效果。本研究旨在比较机器人辅助全髋关节置换术(RA-THA)与传统全髋关节置换术(C-THA)围手术期并发症的发生率。方法:本研究使用全国住院患者样本,对2010年至2014年间3500多万例出院患者进行筛查。国际疾病分类第九次修订版临床改良(ICD-9-CM)程序代码用于识别292836名接受C-THA(ICD 81.51)的患者和946名接受RA-THA(ICD 81.51和ICD 17.41,17.49)的患者。使用ICD-9-CM诊断代码确定围手术期并发症。使用统一的账单患者处置确定患者死亡率。在患者年龄、性别、种族、共病、医院类型和日历年方面,RA-THA队列与C-THA队列在统计学上是1:1匹配的。使用Kruskal-Wallis H检验计算并比较每个队列的平均费用和住院时间(LOS)。Logistic回归分析用于比较两组之间发生严重和轻微并发症的风险。结果:我们匹配了758例(80.13%)RA-THA患者和758例接受C-THA的患者。我们样本中没有患者死亡。与常规组相比,多变量分析显示RA-THA患者发生主要并发症的风险相似(优势比=0.698,95%可信区间=0.282至1.727)。此外,尽管RA-THA队列的轻微并发症发生率较高(21.6%对12.5%,P=0.004),但在多变量分析中未观察到差异(优势比=1.248,95%置信区间=0.852至1.829)。RA-THA的平均住院费用为$20046(SD=6165),而C-THA的平均住院费用为$18258(SD=6147)(P<0.001)。RA-THA的平均服务水平为2.69天(SD=1.25),而C-THA的平均服务水平为2.82天(SD=1.18,P<0.001)。讨论:在统计匹配的队列中,RA-THA患者与C-THA患者围手术期并发症的风险相似。然而,尽管服务水平较低,RA-THA的成本更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号