首页> 外文期刊>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery >Deaths following withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy: Opportunities for quality improvement?
【24h】

Deaths following withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy: Opportunities for quality improvement?

机译:撤回人寿维持治疗后死亡:质量改进的机会?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND Mortality is an important trauma center outcome. With many patients initially surviving catastrophic injuries and a growing proportion of geriatric patients, many deaths might occur following withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy (WLST). We utilized the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database to explore whether deaths following WLST might be preventable and to evaluate the impact of excluding patients who died following WLST on hospital performance. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data derived from American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program. Adult trauma patients treated at Levels I and II centers in 2016 were included. Three cohorts of deceased patients were created to assess differences in hospital performance. The first included all deaths, the second included only those who died without WLST, and the third included deaths without WLST and deaths with WLST where death was preceded by a major complication. Hospitals were ranked based on their observed-to-expected mortality ratio calculated using each of the three decedent cohorts. Outcomes included absolute change in hospital ranking and change in performance outlier status between cohorts. RESULTS We identified 275,939 patients treated at 447 centers who met inclusion criteria. Overall mortality was 6.9% (n = 19,145). Withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy preceded 43.6% (n = 8,343) of deaths and 23% (n = 1,920) of these patients experienced a major complication before death. The median absolute change in hospital performance rank between the first and second cohort was 58 (p< 0.001), between the first and third cohort was 44 (p< 0.001), and between the second and third cohort was 23 (p< 0.001). Hospital performance outlier status changed significantly between cohorts. CONCLUSION The exclusion of patients who die following WLST from benchmarking efforts leads to a major change in hospital ranks. Potentially preventable deaths, such as those following a major complication, should not be excluded.
机译:背景死亡率是创伤中心的一个重要结果。由于许多患者最初在灾难性损伤中幸存下来,老年患者的比例越来越高,许多死亡可能发生在停止维持生命治疗(WLST)后。我们利用美国外科医生学会创伤质量改善项目数据库,探讨WLST后死亡是否可以预防,并评估排除WLST后死亡患者对医院绩效的影响。方法采用美国外科医师学会创伤质量改善项目的数据进行回顾性队列研究。2016年在一级和二级中心接受治疗的成年创伤患者包括在内。创建了三组死亡患者,以评估医院绩效的差异。第一组包括所有死亡病例,第二组仅包括未经WLST的死亡病例,第三组包括未经WLST的死亡病例,以及死亡前伴有严重并发症的WLST患者。根据观察到的死亡率与预期死亡率之比(使用三个死亡队列中的每个队列计算)对医院进行排名。结果包括医院排名的绝对变化和队列间表现异常状态的变化。结果我们确定了在447个中心接受治疗的275939名患者符合纳入标准。总死亡率为6.9%(n=19145)。43.6%(n=8343)的患者在停止维持生命治疗前死亡,23%(n=1920)的患者在死亡前出现严重并发症。第一组和第二组之间医院绩效等级的绝对变化中位数为58(p<0.001),第一组和第三组之间的绝对变化中位数为44(p<0.001),第二组和第三组之间的绝对变化中位数为23(p<0.001)。队列间医院绩效异常值状态发生显著变化。结论将死于WLST的患者排除在基准工作之外,导致医院级别发生重大变化。不应排除可能可预防的死亡,如严重并发症后的死亡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号