首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of arthroplasty >The Effect of Pelvic Tilt and Femoral Head Size on Hip Range-of-Motion to Impingement
【24h】

The Effect of Pelvic Tilt and Femoral Head Size on Hip Range-of-Motion to Impingement

机译:盆腔倾斜和股骨头尺寸对冲击髋关节运动范围的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Background About 50%-70% of dislocators have cups placed within so-called “safe zones.” It has been postulated that factors such as femoral head size and pelvic tilt, obliquity, or rotation may influence postoperative stability. Therefore, we assessed varying degrees of pelvic tilt and head sizes on the range of motion (ROM) to impingement. Methods A hip simulator was used to import models of 10 subjects who performed object pickup, squatting, and low-chair rising. Parameters were set for pelvic tilt, stem version, and the specific motions as defined by the subjects. Femur-to-pelvis relative motions were determined for abduction/adduction, internal/external rotation, and flexion/extension. Varying tilt angles were tested. Thirty-two millimeter and 36-mm head with a standard cup and 42-mm dual mobility cup were tested. Cup orientations for abduction and anteversion combinations were chosen, and computations of minimum clearances or impingement between components were made. Results The ROM to impingement varied with the different pelvic tilts and femoral head sizes and with the different motions. The larger the head size, the larger the impingement-free ROM. Negative 10° of pelvic tilt led to the largest impingement-free zone, whereas 10° of forward tilt was associated with fewer impingement-free cup anteversion and abduction angle combinations. Variations in pelvic tilt had the greatest influence on object pickup and affected the impingement-free “safe zone.” Conclusion Targets for impingement-free motion may be smaller when considering varying pelvic tilts and femoral head sizes, particularly for certain activities, such as object pickup. These findings may indicate the need for more individualized patient planning.
机译:抽象背景:大约50%-70%的脱臼器的罩杯位于所谓的“安全区”内据推测,诸如股骨头大小和骨盆倾斜、倾斜或旋转等因素可能会影响术后稳定性。因此,我们评估了不同程度的骨盆倾斜和头部大小对撞击运动范围(ROM)的影响。方法使用髋关节模拟器导入10名受试者的模型,这些受试者进行物体拾取、蹲下和低椅上升。根据受试者所定义的骨盆倾斜、躯干扭转和特定运动设置参数。测定外展/内收、内/外旋转和屈曲/伸展的股骨至骨盆相对运动。测试了不同的倾斜角度。测试了32毫米和36毫米标准杯头和42毫米双活动杯头。选择外展和前倾组合的杯方向,并计算部件之间的最小间隙或撞击。结果不同的骨盆倾斜度、股骨头大小和不同的运动方式对撞击的ROM有不同的影响。头部尺寸越大,无撞击ROM越大。骨盆倾斜负10°导致最大的无撞击区,而向前倾斜10°与较少的无撞击杯前倾角和外展角组合相关。骨盆倾斜的变化对物体拾取和无撞击“安全区”的影响最大结论当考虑不同的骨盆倾斜和股骨头大小时,无撞击运动的目标可能更小,尤其是在某些活动中,如物体拾取。这些发现可能表明需要更个性化的患者计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号