首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Human Genetics >Combined Utility of 25 Disease and Risk Factor Polygenic Risk Scores for Stratifying Risk of All-Cause Mortality
【24h】

Combined Utility of 25 Disease and Risk Factor Polygenic Risk Scores for Stratifying Risk of All-Cause Mortality

机译:组合型疾病和危险因素的危险性多基因风险分数,用于分层所有导致死亡率的风险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While genome-wide association studies have identified susceptibility variants for numerous traits, their combined utility for predicting broad measures of health, such as mortality, remains poorly understood. We used data from the UK Biobank to combine polygenic risk scores (PRS) for 13 diseases and 12 mortality risk factors into sex-specific composite PRS (cPRS). These cPRS were moderately associated with all-cause mortality in independent data within the UK Biobank: the estimated hazard ratios per standard deviation were 1.10 (95% confidence interval: 1.05, 1.16) and 1.15 (1.10, 1.19) for women and men, respectively. Differences in life expectancy between the top and bottom 5% of the cPRS were estimated to be 4.79 (1.76, 7.81) years and 6.75 (4.16, 9.35) years for women and men, respectively. These associations were substantially attenuated after adjusting for non-genetic mortality risk factors measured at study entry (i.e., middle age for most participants). The cPRS may be useful in counseling younger individuals at higher genetic risk of mortality on modification of non-genetic factors.
机译:虽然全基因组关联研究已经确定了许多性状的易感性变体,但它们在预测广泛的健康指标(如死亡率)方面的综合效用仍然知之甚少。我们使用来自英国生物银行的数据,将13种疾病和12种死亡风险因素的多基因风险评分(PRS)合并到性别特异性复合PRS(CPR)中。在英国生物银行的独立数据中,这些CPR与全因死亡率中度相关:女性和男性的每标准偏差估计危险比分别为1.10(95%置信区间:1.05,1.16)和1.15(1.10,1.19)。最高和最低5%的CPR患者的预期寿命差异估计分别为4.79(1.76,7.81)岁和6.75(4.16,9.35)岁。在调整研究开始时测量的非遗传死亡率风险因素(即大多数参与者的中年)后,这些相关性显著减弱。CPR可能有助于对非遗传因素修改后具有较高死亡遗传风险的年轻人进行咨询。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号