...
【24h】

Effects of Socioeconomic Status on Alzheimer Disease Mortality in Taiwan

机译:社会经济地位对台湾阿尔茨海默病死亡率的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: The combined effects of individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) on survival rates of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) remain unclear. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: National Health Insurance Bureau of Taiwan data (2003-2012). Participants: Patients with AD. Measurements: The authors aimed to analyze the effects of neighborhood and individual SES on the 5-year survival rates of patients with AD. The author defined individual and neighborhood SES based on income-related insurance payment amounts and residence in advantaged versus disadvantaged areas and compared survival rates using the Cox proportional hazards model after adjusting for risk factors. Results: A total of 1,754 patients with AD were identified. Each patient was followed for 5 years or censored. The 5-year overall survival rates were worst for those with a low individual SES in a disadvantaged area. After adjustment for sex, age, and comorbidities, patients with a low individual SES living in disadvantaged areas had the worse survival rate than those with a high SES (hazard ratio: 2.19; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.53-3.13). In contrast, after the adjustment for characteristics, patients with a high individual SES in disadvantaged areas had a similar mortality rate to those with a high individual SES in advantaged areas (hazard ratio: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.64-1.35). Conclusion: Despite universal health coverage, patients with AD and a low individual SES in disadvantaged areas exhibited the worst survival rate. The socioeconomic survival gradient among patients with AD in Taiwan may result from differences in major attributes of individual and neighborhood SES.
机译:目的:个体和社区社会经济地位(SES)对阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者生存率的综合影响尚不清楚。设计:回顾性队列研究。单位:台湾国家健康保险局数据(2003-2012)。参与者:阿尔茨海默病患者。测量:作者旨在分析社区和个人SES对阿尔茨海默病患者5年生存率的影响。作者根据收入相关的保险支付金额和居住在有利地区与不利地区定义了个人和社区SES,并使用Cox比例风险模型比较了生存率调整风险因素后。结果:共发现1754例AD患者。每名患者都被随访5年或审查。弱势地区个体SES较低者的5年总生存率最差。在对性别、年龄和共病进行调整后,生活在贫困地区的低个体SES患者的生存率比高SES患者差(危险比:2.19;95%置信区间[CI]:1.53-3.13)。相比之下,在调整特征后,弱势地区个体SES高的患者的死亡率与优势地区个体SES高的患者相似(危险比:0.93;95%可信区间:0.64-1.35)。结论:尽管全民医疗覆盖,但生活在贫困地区的AD患者和低个体SES患者的生存率最差。台湾AD患者的社会经济生存梯度可能源于个体和社区SES主要属性的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号