...
首页> 外文期刊>Tasmanian naturalist >A new look for Tasmania's terrestrial amphipods (sandhoppers, beachfleas and landhoppers)
【24h】

A new look for Tasmania's terrestrial amphipods (sandhoppers, beachfleas and landhoppers)

机译:塔斯马尼亚陆地两栖动物(Sandhoppers,Beachfleas和Landhoppers)的新寻找

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Rev. T. R. R. Stebbing, who wrote major works on the Amphipoda around the turn of the 19~(th) century, had no illusions about their popular appeal: 'No panegyrist of the Amphipoda has vet been able to evoke anything like popular enthusiasm in their favour. To the generality of observers they arc only not repelled because the glance which falls upon them is unarrested, ignores them, is unconscious of their presence' (Stebbing 1899). While the readership of The Tasmanian Naturalist might not be quite so unmoved, there's no doubt that freshwater and terrestrial crustaceans do not figure as highly in the invertebrate natural history stakes as the insects. Most Tasmanian naturalists are aware of freshwater crayfish, and Photograph: Maria Moore). land slaters (woodlice, roly-polies, tiggyhogs, parson's pigs, grammersows ...) are generally recognised (if only the introduced European species). But terrestrial amphipods, or landhoppers (Plate 1), move off so quickly from under that flowerpot in the garden, or in forest leaf litter, that there's little opportunity to observe them closely, or take a photograph, and so their public profile remains sadly low.
机译:牧师。T.R.R.Stebbing在19世纪之交写了关于端足类动物的主要著作,他对它们的大众吸引力没有任何幻想:“端足类动物的泛赞助者都无法唤起人们对它们的热情。对于一般的观察者来说,他们并没有被排斥,只是因为落在他们身上的目光没有被察觉,忽略了他们,没有意识到他们的存在”(Stebbing 1899)。尽管《塔斯马尼亚博物学家》的读者们可能并不那么无动于衷,但毫无疑问,淡水和陆生甲壳类动物在无脊椎动物自然历史中的地位不如昆虫高。大多数塔斯马尼亚博物学家都知道淡水小龙虾,照片:玛丽亚·摩尔(Maria Moore)。土地板岩(林地、罗利·波利斯、虎猪、牧师猪、格拉默索……)被普遍认可(如果只有引进的欧洲物种)。但是陆生端足类动物,或者叫陆栖飞虱(图1),从花园里的花盆下面,或者森林里的落叶层中快速移动,几乎没有机会仔细观察它们,或者拍照,所以它们的公众形象仍然很低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号