...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychosomatic Medicine: Journal of the American Psychosomatic Society >Mindfulness-Based Analgesia or Placebo Effect? The Development and Evaluation of a Sham Mindfulness Intervention for Acute Experimental Pain
【24h】

Mindfulness-Based Analgesia or Placebo Effect? The Development and Evaluation of a Sham Mindfulness Intervention for Acute Experimental Pain

机译:正念为基于镇痛或安慰剂效应? 严肃实验性疼痛的假心灵干预的开发与评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective Meta-analyses indicate that mindfulness meditation is efficacious for chronic and acute pain, but most available studies lack active control comparisons. This raises the possibility that placebo-related processes may account, at least in part, for mindfulness effects. The objective of this study was to develop a closely matched sham mindfulness condition to establish whether placebo effects contribute to mindfulness-based interventions for pain. Methods We developed and validated a closely matched sham mindfulness intervention then compared it with 6 x 20-minute sessions of focused-attention mindfulness and a no-treatment condition in 93 healthy volunteers undergoing acute experimental heat pain. Results The sham mindfulness intervention produced equivalent credibility ratings and expectations of improvement as the mindfulness intervention but did not influence mindfulness-related processes. In contrast, mindfulness increased "observing" relative to no treatment but not sham. Mindfulness (F(1,88) = 7.06, p = .009, eta(2)(p) = 0.07) and sham (F(1,88) = 6.47, p = .012, eta(2)(p) = 0.07) moderately increased pain tolerance relative to no treatment, with no difference between mindfulness and sham (F(1,88) = 0.01, p = .92, eta(2)(p) < 0.001). No differences were found for pain threshold. Similarly, neither mindfulness nor sham reduced pain intensity or unpleasantness relative to no treatment, although mindfulness reduced pain unpleasantness relative to sham (F(1,88) = 5.03, p = .027, eta(2)(p) = 0.05). Conclusions These results suggest that placebo effects contribute to changes in pain tolerance after mindfulness training, with limited evidence of specific effects of mindfulness training on pain unpleasantness relative to sham, but not no treatment. To disentangle the specific analgesic effects of mindfulness from placebo-related processes, future research should prioritize developing and incorporating closely matched sham conditions.
机译:客观荟萃分析表明正念冥想对慢性和急性疼痛有效,但大多数现有研究缺乏主动对照比较。这增加了一种可能性,即安慰剂相关的过程可能至少部分地解释了正念效应。本研究的目的是建立一个紧密匹配的假正念状态,以确定安慰剂效应是否有助于基于正念的疼痛干预。方法我们开发并验证了一种紧密匹配的假正念干预,然后将其与93名接受急性实验性热痛的健康志愿者的6×20分钟集中注意力正念和无治疗状态进行比较。结果与正念干预相比,假正念干预产生了与正念干预相同的可信度评分和改善期望,但不影响正念相关过程。相比之下,正念提高了“观察”能力,而不是假治疗。正念(F(1,88)=7.06,p=.009,eta(2)(p)=0.07)和假正念(F(1,88)=6.47,p=.012,eta(2)(p)=0.07)与未治疗相比,中度增加了疼痛耐受性,正念与假正念之间没有差异(F(1,88)=0.01,p=.92,eta(2)(p)<0.001)。疼痛阈值没有发现差异。同样,正念和假正念都没有降低与未治疗相比的疼痛强度或不适感,尽管正念降低了与假正念相比的疼痛不适感(F(1,88)=5.03,p=.027,eta(2)(p)=0.05)。结论这些结果表明,安慰剂效应有助于正念训练后疼痛耐受性的变化,与假手术相比,正念训练对疼痛不适的具体影响证据有限,但没有治疗。为了将正念的特定镇痛效果与安慰剂相关过程分开,未来的研究应该优先发展和纳入密切匹配的假条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号