...
首页> 外文期刊>Prehospital and disaster medicine : >Policy, Practice, and Research Agenda for Emergency Medical Services Oversight: A Systematic Review and Environmental Scan
【24h】

Policy, Practice, and Research Agenda for Emergency Medical Services Oversight: A Systematic Review and Environmental Scan

机译:紧急医疗服务监督的政策,实践和研究议程:系统审查和环境扫描

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction: In a 2015 report, the Institute of Medicine (IOM; Washington, DC USA), now the National Academy of Medicine (NAM; Washington, DC USA), stated that the field of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) exhibits signs of fragmentation; an absence of system-wide coordination and planning; and a lack of federal, state, and local accountability. The NAM recommended clarifying what roles the federal government, state governments, and local communities play in the oversight and evaluation of EMS system performance, and how they may better work together to improve care.
机译:导言:在2015年的一份报告中,医学研究所(IOM;美国华盛顿特区),现在的美国国家医学院(NAM;美国华盛顿特区)表示,紧急医疗服务(EMS)领域呈现出分裂的迹象;缺乏全系统的协调和规划;以及缺乏联邦、州和地方问责制。不结盟运动建议澄清联邦政府、州政府和地方社区在EMS系统绩效监督和评估中发挥的作用,以及它们如何更好地合作改善护理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号