...
首页> 外文期刊>Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B. Biological Sciences >The neural basis of ideological differences in race categorization
【24h】

The neural basis of ideological differences in race categorization

机译:种族分类思想差异的神经基础

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Multiracial individuals are often categorized as members of their 'socially subordinate' racial group-a form of social discrimination termed hypodescent-with political conservatives more likely than liberals to show this bias. Although hypodescent has been linked to racial hierarchy preservation motives, it remains unclear how political ideology influences categorization: Do conservatives and liberals see, feel or think about mixed-race faces differently? Do they differ in sensitivity to Black prototypicality (i.e. skin tone darkness and Afrocentric features) or racial ambiguity (i.e. categorization difficulty) of Black/White mixed-race faces? To help answer these questions, we collected a politically diverse sample of White participants and had them categorize mixed-race faces as Black or White during functional neuroimaging. We found that conservatism was related to greater anterior insula activity to racially ambiguous faces, and this pattern of brain activation mediated conservatives' use of hypodescent. This demonstrates that conservatives' greater sensitivity to racial ambiguity (rather than Black prototypicality) gives rise to greater categorization of mixed-race individuals into the socially subordinate group and tentatively suggests that conservatives may differ from liberals in their affective reactions to mixed-race faces. Implications for the study of race categorization and political psychology are discussed. This article is part of the theme issue 'The political brain: neurocognitive and computational mechanisms'.
机译:多种族个人通常被归类为其“社会从属”种族群体的成员,这是一种被称为低血统的社会歧视形式,政治保守派比自由派更有可能表现出这种偏见。虽然低血统与种族等级保护动机有关,但尚不清楚政治意识形态如何影响分类:保守派和自由派对混血面孔的看法、感受或思考是否有所不同?他们对黑人原型(即肤色黑暗和以非洲为中心的特征)或黑人/白人混血面孔的种族模糊性(即分类困难)的敏感性是否不同?为了帮助回答这些问题,我们收集了一个政治上不同的白人参与者样本,并让他们在功能性神经成像期间将混血面孔归类为黑人或白人。我们发现保守主义者在种族不明确的面孔上,与更大的前岛叶活动有关,而这种大脑激活模式介导了保守主义者对低血统的使用。这表明,保守派对种族模糊性(而非黑人原型)更敏感,导致混血个体被更多地归类为社会从属群体,并初步表明保守派在对混血面孔的情感反应上可能不同于自由派。讨论了种族分类和政治心理学研究的意义。这篇文章是“政治大脑:神经认知和计算机制”主题的一部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号