【24h】

ROOT METAPHOR AND BIOETHICS

机译:根隐喻和生物伦理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

While a substantial amount of work has been done on the metaphors used in bioethics (such as the body as "property" or the ethics consultant as "engineer"), this essay focuses on the manner in which metaphors reside at the core of various bioethics theories. Drawing upon Stephen Pepper's (1942) notion that philosophical positions are expressions of specific "root metaphors" (similarity, machine, organism, act), the essay will look at the way theories such as principlism, rule-based ethics, casuistry, and phenomenological ethics are also grounded in particular root metaphors. These root metaphors express fundamentally different notions of the way the world operates, and thus arguments over the superiority of particular moral theories are actually disagreements over worldviews and cannot be resolved through rational discourse. To agree with an alternative theory would entail the adoption of a fundamentally different root metaphor for understanding the way the world works.
机译:虽然已经对生物伦理学中使用的隐喻(如身体作为“财产”或伦理顾问作为“工程师”)做了大量的研究,但本文主要关注隐喻在各种生物伦理学理论中的核心地位。根据斯蒂芬·佩珀(Stephen Pepper,1942)的观点,即哲学立场是特定“根隐喻”(相似性、机器、有机体、行为)的表达,本文将探讨原则主义、基于规则的伦理学、因果论和现象学伦理学等理论也是以特定的根隐喻为基础的。这些根源隐喻表达了对世界运行方式的根本不同的概念,因此,关于特定道德理论优越性的争论实际上是对世界观的分歧,无法通过理性话语来解决。同意另一种理论需要采用一种根本不同的根隐喻来理解世界的运作方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号