...
首页> 外文期刊>Synthese: An International Journal for Epistemology, Methodology and Philosophy of Science >Scientific explanation, unifying mathematics, and indispensability arguments (A new Cicada MES)
【24h】

Scientific explanation, unifying mathematics, and indispensability arguments (A new Cicada MES)

机译:科学解释,统一数学和不可或缺的论证(一个新的Cicada Mes)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Indispensability arguments occupy a prominent role in discussions of mathematical realism. While different versions of these arguments are discussed in the literature, their general structure remains the same. These arguments contend that insofar as reference to mathematical objects is indispensable to science, we are committed to the existence of these 'objects'. Unsurprisingly, much of the debate concerning indispensability arguments focuses on the crucial contention that mathematical objects are indispensable to science. For these arguments to provide support for mathematical realism, what we require are some compelling examples of mathematics playing an indispensable role in science. Towards this end, Alan Baker has supplied an example in which mathematics appears to be indispensable to a scientific explanation, what has come to be called the "Cicada MES". This example has been the subject of much criticism, most notably that it depends on an unsupported empirical supposition. Recently, Baker proposed a number of revisions to the Cicada MES that aim to address some of these criticisms. In this paper, I argue that while Baker's revisions go some way towards mitigating prominent criticisms of the Cicada MES, the underlying problem with the explanation remains. I argue that his revisions actually go in the wrong direction mathematically and empirically. In contrast, I propose a new Cicada MES. This new version accomplishes Baker's goals and responds to the central objection to the explanation. It invokes a mathematical principle that plays a unifying role in the explanation, which makes providing adequate nominalist surrogates more difficult. And, more importantly, it accommodates an empirically grounded explanation of the phenomenon to be explained. Consequently, this new Cicada MES provides what proponents of indispensability arguments require, a compelling example of mathematics playing an indispensable role in science.
机译:不可或缺的论点在数学实在论的讨论中占有突出的地位。虽然文献中讨论了这些论点的不同版本,但它们的总体结构保持不变。这些论点主张,只要提及数学对象对科学来说是不可或缺的,我们就致力于这些“对象”的存在。不出所料,许多关于不可或缺性的争论都集中在一个关键论点上,即数学对象对科学来说是不可或缺的。为了支持数学实在论,我们需要一些令人信服的例子,说明数学在科学中发挥着不可或缺的作用。为此,艾伦·贝克(Alan Baker)提供了一个例子,在这个例子中,数学似乎是科学解释不可或缺的,也就是所谓的“蝉”。这个例子受到了很多批评,最值得注意的是,它依赖于一个未经证实的经验假设。最近,贝克对《蝉传》提出了一些修订,旨在解决其中一些批评。在本文中,我认为,虽然贝克的修订在一定程度上减轻了对蝉鸣的突出批评,但解释的根本问题仍然存在。我认为他的修正实际上在数学和经验上都走错了方向。相比之下,我提出了一种新的蝉。这个新版本实现了贝克的目标,回应了对解释的核心异议。它引用了一个在解释中起到统一作用的数学原理,这使得提供足够的名词代词更加困难。而且,更重要的是,它为要解释的现象提供了基于经验的解释。因此,这只新蝉提供了不可或缺论点的支持者所需要的,数学在科学中发挥不可或缺作用的一个引人注目的例子。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号