首页> 外文期刊>Annals of hematology >Impact of critical care reconfiguration and track-and-trigger outreach team intervention on outcomes of haematology patients requiring intensive care admission.
【24h】

Impact of critical care reconfiguration and track-and-trigger outreach team intervention on outcomes of haematology patients requiring intensive care admission.

机译:重症监护室的重新配置和跟踪与推广团队的干预对需要重症监护的血液病患者预后的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Patients with haematological disorders have previously been considered to have poor outcomes following admission to intensive care units. Although a number of haematology centres from outside the UK have now demonstrated improved outcomes, the continuing perception of poor outcomes in this patient group continues to adversely affect their chances of being admitted to some intensive care units (ICUs). Over the past 10 years, there have been many advances within the disciplines of both haematology and intensive care medicine. This study was done to assess outcomes and the impact of an early warning scoring system (EWS) and early involvement of ICU outreach teams. One hundred five haematology patients (haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) or non-HSCT) had 114 admissions to ICU between April 2006 and August 2008 which coincided with hospital-wide implementation of EWS. The survival to ICU discharge was 56 (53%). Thirty-three (33%) patients were alive at 6 months giving a 1-year survival of 31%. Of the 39 HSCT patients, nine were post-autologous and 30 post-allogeneic transplant. The survival to ICU discharge was 22 (56%) with 14 (36%) patients alive at 6 months. One year survival was 36%. Prior to the introduction of EWS and critical care outreach team (2004), survival to ICU discharge was 44% which has increased to 53% (2006-2008). This is despite an increase in mechanical ventilation in 2006-2008 (50%) as compared to 2004 (32%).The improvement in ICU survivorship was even more prominent in HSCT patients (37% in 2004 versus 56% in 2006-2008). There was a trend towards decreasing Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation scores with time, suggesting appropriate patients being identified earlier and having timely escalation of their treatment.
机译:先前曾被血液病患者认为重症监护病房结局较差。尽管现在英国以外的许多血液学中心显示出了改善的结局,但是对这一患者组不良结局的持续认识继续不利地影响了他们被某些重症监护病房(ICU)收住的机会。在过去的十年中,血液学和重症监护医学领域都取得了许多进步。进行这项研究是为了评估结果和预警评分系统(EWS)的影响以及ICU外展团队的早期参与。在2006年4月至2008年8月期间,有105例血液学患者(造血干细胞移植(HSCT)或非HSCT)有114例入ICU,这与医院范围内EWS的实施相吻合。重症监护病房出院存活率为56(53%)。 33名患者(33%)在6个月时还活着,一年生存率达31%。在39例HSCT患者中,有9例为自体移植和30例为异体移植。重症监护病房出院存活率为22(56%),其中14个月(36%)患者在6个月时还活着。一年生存率为36%。在引入EWS和重症监护外展团队之前(2004年),ICU出院生存率为44%,现已增加到53%(2006-2008年)。尽管与2004年(32%)相比2006-2008年(50%)的机械通气有所增加.HSCT患者的ICU存活率改善更为显着(2004年为37%,2006-2008年为56%) 。随着时间的流逝,急性生理和慢性健康评估得分呈下降趋势,这表明较早发现合适的患者并及时进行治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号