首页> 外文期刊>Fertility and Sterility: Official Journal of the American Fertility Society, Pacific Coast Fertility Society, and the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society >Growth hormone cotreatment for poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Growth hormone cotreatment for poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:在体外施肥循环中患者的恶性响应者的生长激素分类:系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of growth hormone (GH) supplementation in improving the in vitro fertilization (IVF) out- comes of poor responders. Design: Systematic review and meta -analysis. Setting: Not applicable. Patient(s): Poor ovarian responders undergoing conventional IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Intervention(s): Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of poor ovarian responders undergoing a single IVF/ICSI cycle with GH supple- mentation versus conventional controlled ovarian stimulation. This review was registered in the PROSPERO database before starting data extraction (CRD42020151681). Main Outcome Measure(s): Primary outcome was live birth rate. Clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, number of oocytes, number of mature (metaphase II [MII]) oocytes and the number of embryos available to transfer were considered as secondary outcomes. Result(s): Twelve RCTs were included; 586 women were assigned to the intervention group and 553 to the control group. The analysis revealed that patients receiving GH supplementation did not show an increased live birth rate, miscarriage rate, or ongoing pregnancy rate. However, GH supplementation in poor responders increased clinical pregnancy rate, number of oocytes retrieved (mean difference 1.62), number of MII oocytes (mean difference 2.06), and number of embryos available to transfer (mean difference 0.76). Sensitivity and subgroup analyses did not provide statistical changes to pooled results. Conclusion(s): The present meta -analysis provides evidence that GH supplementation may improve some reproductive outcomes in poor responders, but not live birth rates. (Fertil Steril (R) 2020;114:97-109. (C) 2020 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
机译:None

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号